Close Menu
    Karten

    Interessant

    Share.
    View 13 Comments

    13 Kommentare

    1. eztab on

      use smaller subdivisions and you can basically make the map completely white. GDP and where it is generated are just really ill-defined.

    2. BadSausageFactory on

      I’m not sure how a map of GDP in the US wouldn’t include california. but would include vermont.

    5. Atlatica on

      Alternatively; these 3 regions would starve and collapse from a lack of natural resources without the white areas supporting them

    7. straightdge on

      If you consider just US healthcare GDP, and absolutely nothing else, still US has higher GDP per capita than China. Yet, the Chinese have similarly expected life expectancy as US and maybe higher healthy life expectancy. Just a point to prove that GDP stats don’t mean much in real terms.

    8. chamomile_tea_reply on

      Use county level data and this could get significant smaller, and glean a higher GDP percentage.

      Just grab counties in downstate NY, Southern California, Boston area, and Dallas/Houston areas.

      In Europe: London area, Berlin metro, Paris metro. Thats all.

      And so on

    9. jcpopm on

      If you’re gonna do a map like this, why the fuck would you include Mississippi?

    10. Zenfulbliss on

      Uh, how is California not part of a dominant region? Seems like you you could slice up the world in a lot of ways and make the same claim.

    12. Electrocat71 on

      I’m not 100% sure of the southern United States part of that… especially since two states listed are respectively the 49th & 50th poorest states in the USA. Plus, I’m pretty sure just the 3 pacific coast states of the United States has a higher gdp than the other 47 states combined.

    13. Mooseycanuck on

      What a silly map. There’s nothing fascinating about this. Is it saying ‘wow such a small area is creating half the worlds gdp’? What is the point of this map?

    Leave A Reply