Close Menu
    Welt

    Die USA unter Trump stellen sich allein gegen die UN-Resolution zu den Frauenrechten, während die Abstimmung unter Jubel mit 37 zu 1 ausgeht

    Share.
    View 47 Comments

    47 Kommentare

    4. CasanovaJones82 on

      It’s all good, if the SAVE act passes than a good percentage of women won’t be able to vote anyway, so that tracks. If the current administration in the US has thier way that’ll be expanded to all American women by 2028.

      They want women to be property, be seen and not heard, don’t speak unless spoken to, barefoot and pregnant, with no job, no Healthcare, no contraception, no education, and no future. They want to go back to when a woman wouldn’t DREAM of divorcing her husband because they are basically a house slave with no rights who couldn’t buy a home or have a checking account or a credit card or a checkbook.

      The MAGA dream!

    5. spadasinul on

      An ethnic romanian being a US ambassador to the UN?? he also had to shoehorn transphobia in lol

    6. Latter-Corner8977 on

      America is currently like a child with a gun, sitting there, staring at you while it is angrily shitting its own pants.

      You can see it’s got massive fucking problems and this likely isn’t going to end well for someone.

    8. Worst_Comment_Evar on

      The country run by the man who thinks he can sexually assault women and they let him do it? That country?

    9. dce42 on

      >Negrea opposed what he characterised as ‚ambiguous language promoting gender ideology,‘ objected to references to sexual and reproductive health that he argued implied abortion rights,

      Okay, i at least see where they are coming from by wanting to restrict „genders“ to a binary set.

      >and took issue with proposed AI governance language, which he described as censorship.

      Say what now?

    10. RetroTheGameBro on

      This country, under Trump and his flunkies, is an absolute disgrace.

      Every single day I’m somehow more disgusted by this nation than I was the previous day.

    13. Westbrooks3ptShot on

      Crazy in my short life I have gone from thinking USA is the protectors of the free world to realizing we are the primary cause of death and destruction worldwide.

    14. FL060 on

      For those curious, the US objected to DEI, climate change and gender definition language in the document.

    15. capnfoo on

      Republicans think their misogyny makes them seem like tough hardasses when in reality it makes them look like the homoerotic version of the Little Rascals and their “he-man woman haters club.”

    16. Cubey42 on

      Like I praise the resolution and all but it’s not like most of the world where women need this would actually see any of these resolutions adopted.

    17. trollking66 on

      the US president is king of the incels. If he wasnt born with money he would get none.

    18. Migrant-With-MK47 on

      Keep voting GOP conservative American women; you deserve what’s coming next in the US.

    20. gaanmetde on

      “The USA were the only country in the world that voted against a bill to improve women’s rights.

      Largely because they thought it might make their complete abortion ban illegal.”

      Yikes America, yikes.

    21. Seaman_First_Class on

      Interesting list of countries that voted yes. I know abortion is either outright or effectively illegal in several of those places. I wonder if this signals a shift in governance for them, or if they didn’t have the same concerns that the US brought up. 

    22. JROBOTO on

      I feel like with votes like this, each member voting should have to publish a justification for their reasoning because I cannot come up with any reason this resolution would be considered bad.

    24. JoeAbs2 on

      What a weird time we live in where China are the ones agreeing with the rest of us and the US stand alone.

    27. RutherfordRevelation on

      Reasons US opposed:
      > The U.S. government said it objected to specific language and policy implications in the document.
      >1. “Gender ideology” concerns
      U.S. representatives argued the text contained ambiguous language promoting “gender ideology”, which they said could go beyond protections for women and include broader gender identity policies. 
      >2. Reproductive rights wording
      The U.S. objected to references to sexual and reproductive health, arguing that the wording could be interpreted as supporting abortion rights internationally. 
      >3. Regulation of technology
      Some provisions related to regulating artificial intelligence and online speech were criticized by the U.S. as potentially enabling censorship. 
      >4. Attempted amendments
      Before the vote, the U.S. tried to:
      • Delay or withdraw the text
      • Introduce eight amendments removing those controversial sections

      >Other countries rejected those amendments, and the resolution passed anyway.

    32. SgtNeilDiamond on

      This admin is a shit stain on this country that is going to take a long time to clean out.

    34. Alone_Again_2 on

      How will the USA ever undo the damage that they’ve inflicted on themselves?

      They have obliterated all the goodwill that they have amassed over 250 years in a couple of years.

    35. LoveThinkers on

      Where are all the „USA USA USA“ chants?
      Are they starting to sound like we hear them in the rest of the world?

    36. wwarnout on

      Hey, American women – remember this when you vote in November. Trump, and by extension the GOP, don’t believe that you should have as many rights at men.

    38. TheGreatestQuestion on

      It makes sense the US would want amendments. If the language in the resolution is ambiguous, that ambiguity within a UN framework creates room for expansive interpretations that could allow millions of dollars to flow through UN programs tied to abortion initiatives framed around transgender categories, including people who biologically cannot give birth.

      When terminology remains undefined, funding streams become easy vehicles for grift and abuse, allowing money to be justified under broad mandates that are never clearly spelled out.

    39. UseDue6373 on

      I’m so embarrassed to be a citizen under this pedophile’s absolute redacted power

    42. ShakesDontBreak on

      The US only seems to care about women when women are used as props against transgender women.

    45. sector16 on

      Maga sees this as a badge of honour, especially Maga women. Make sense of that.

    46. Fuwa-Aika on

      Genuine question. Hoping someone can explain. Does this bill actually do anything for the women in those countries?

      Looking at some of the countries that voted yes is not a safe haven for women by any means.

    47. SoCalThrowAway7 on

      Can’t be, more than half of white women voters voted for Trump, surely they couldn’t all have been voting against their own interests right?

    Leave A Reply