Close Menu
    Technik

    Warum Hunderte von Menschen in L.A. Kameras an ihren Körper schnallen, um Hausarbeiten zu erledigen

    Share.
    View 23 Comments

    23 Kommentare

    1. itastesok on

      People in LA are getting paid to wear head and wrist cameras while doing household chores — dishes, cooking, cleaning — so robotics companies can train AI on real human movement.

    2. sampleminded on

      Turns out the AI is intelligent but not general. Robots can fold laundry they just need a million hours of videos of people folding to train on. Like if AI tech stays the same we’ll still be training it to do new things in 50 years. Basically everything is like waymo, AI can drive but it will take 10 years of training to get to a place with no safety drivers. It will replace lots of jobs but each one will take a long time to learn. Programming and text work because the data was already there to scrape.

    3. roodammy44 on

      It looks like those are single lens cameras. Why wouldn’t they train in stereo and get the depth information too? Seems like depth would be very useful to robots trying to reach for things.

    4. citrusco on

      Selling convenience has been the story of the year for a decade, yet I find myself more fussed today now than ever.

    7. Commonpleas on

      Is this the best the Brainiacs can do? Make a machine that’s shaped like a human, that has all the same limitations that the human has? A mechanical human is not the pinnacle of success here.

    8. BonelessB0nes on

      Ha, no mansion would be a safe place for any robot that I trained to do housework.

    9. Powerful_Resident_48 on

      Let me guess: To train Ai. So we can have robots that can successfully fail to do household chores one day.

    10. rayferrell on

      This is crowdsourced data for robotics. Paying gig workers for natural movement beats lab setups and speeds up real-world AI training. Expect competent home bots soon.

    11. Orangesteel on

      Can we stop with clickbait titles with no context, it’s done just to drive website traffic.

    13. CivicDutyCalls on

      Literally the only AI that I support.

      The time it would give me back…

      Hell, if I were an employer, and these were prohibitively expensive for a middle class person to buy, I’d consider finding to a a service that allowed me to provide one of these to all of my employees as a perk. If they leave, they lose the robot. As an employee, I would refuse to work for a company that didn’t offer this as a benefit.

      As an employee, if I were provided one of these as a benefit, it would tell me that my employer cases about my free time. I’d consider working longer hours because it would mean not sacrificing time for my family. If my kids are home, I’m not working. If they’re away, I might finish that project.

    18. relevant__comment on

      Bout time we start getting the robots to do the stuff that matters.

    21. Lower_Ad_1317 on

      So this carries on until launching agi based on the data from California.

      A year passes and it comes to Britain.

      Someone asks it to “make a brew”.

      World chaos ensues as machine learning melts trying to decipher the coded language used by a cheeky cockney.

    22. Mr_YUP on

      Makes me wonder how much we under value the processing power a baby is doing as it’s growing. Considering how many times you gotta show a toddler how to do something, or remind them to do something, I’m sure the same applies here. 

    23. pottedPlant_64 on

      I thought it was some new parallel play livestream fad. Someone train AI to shave my legs without nicking the knees and ankles while I watch golden girls and eat pizza.

    Leave A Reply