I am in Kalamazoo, Michigan, where Stryker is headquartered.
Prior to January 2024 I worked in proactive cybersecurity, building infrastructure that detects and prevents attacks before they impact production systems. My work supported platforms used by organizations such as Microsoft and Netflix and involved SIEM tooling.
I applied to a local cybersecurity job, they closed it and reopened the role in Pune India.
How’s that working out for you guys??
onyxlabyrinth1979 on
This kind of cyberattack is worrying because it shows how geopolitical conflicts are starting to spill over into private companies that aren’t directly part of the military side of things. A medical technology company like Stryker makes surgical tools and hospital equipment, so even indirect disruption could affect healthcare systems if it becomes widespread.
Another concern is the shift in motivation. A lot of cyber incidents used to be mostly about ransomware or financial gain. When attacks are tied to retaliation or political signaling, the goal can be disruption rather than profit, which makes the situation harder to predict or contain.
It also raises the question of how prepared companies really are for this kind of threat. Many organizations build security around typical cybercrime risks, but state linked groups often have more resources and patience. If conflicts keep escalating in the physical world, the digital side will probably keep expanding as well.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
2Â Kommentare
I am in Kalamazoo, Michigan, where Stryker is headquartered.
Prior to January 2024 I worked in proactive cybersecurity, building infrastructure that detects and prevents attacks before they impact production systems. My work supported platforms used by organizations such as Microsoft and Netflix and involved SIEM tooling.
I applied to a local cybersecurity job, they closed it and reopened the role in Pune India.
How’s that working out for you guys??
This kind of cyberattack is worrying because it shows how geopolitical conflicts are starting to spill over into private companies that aren’t directly part of the military side of things. A medical technology company like Stryker makes surgical tools and hospital equipment, so even indirect disruption could affect healthcare systems if it becomes widespread.
Another concern is the shift in motivation. A lot of cyber incidents used to be mostly about ransomware or financial gain. When attacks are tied to retaliation or political signaling, the goal can be disruption rather than profit, which makes the situation harder to predict or contain.
It also raises the question of how prepared companies really are for this kind of threat. Many organizations build security around typical cybercrime risks, but state linked groups often have more resources and patience. If conflicts keep escalating in the physical world, the digital side will probably keep expanding as well.