Close Menu
    Technik

    Republikaner im Kongress bringen Gesetzesentwürfe voran, die Kindern aus ideologischen Gründen den Zugang zu Inhalten verwehren würden

    View 19 Comments

    19 Kommentare

    1. drevolut1on on

      The Republican party is corrupt to its very core and must be dismantled if the US wants to survive as a nation.

    4. GarnerGerald11141 on

      States rights, parents rights, individual rights, who gives a shit?

    5. Slfestmaccnt on

      So censorship, thought policing and trying to block anything that might cause a kid to question the religion their community pushes on them. Republican freedom is like everything else Republicans say, the opposite of what they claim they want.

      War is peace, hate is love, cruelty is compassion and empathy is weakness. These people speed run the antichrist checklist all while feigning piety.

    6. SVRealtor on

      The only reason that they care is because they want some Charlie Kirk army that can pray at all schools in all states.

    7. cowhand214 on

      This was always part of the deal of age verification to block “harmful” content. I think most people think pornography or graphic violence and are fine with restricting access to that but the reality is the way many of these things are being written is much broader than that with the obvious consequence of potentially blocking access to LGBTQ information, sex ed information, any support groups or related things, etc.

      And I think most people are not going to realize what is happening until it is too late.

    8. House_On_MangoStreet on

      That’s rich considering the congressional Republican ideology is also blocking accountability for child rapists and murders and justice for their victims.

      As long as the kids don’t see a rainbow flag tho. That might be traumatizing /s

    9. ithinkitslupis on

      >The “App Store Accountability Act” (ASAA) would require app stores to categorize users by age, associate the minors’ accounts with a parental account, and then obtain consent from the parental account when the minor user creates an account on the app store, or installs any app.

      >

      >The Committee also approved the KIDS Act, which would require parental consent before any social media “platform” (website or app) could allow teens to use “any direct messaging feature.”

      >Democrats’ alternative bill, the “Safe Messaging for Kids Act,” is still more focused: it would require only that platforms “shall provide a parental tool to allow a parent of a covered user to view the covered user’s direct messaging control settings.

      I’ll say it again, I only care about the age verification part. If parents are the root of age attestation opting their kids in by entering an age when they set up a device or purchase a connection from a mobile provider or ISP I think that’s fine. And by that I mean adults can just skip the prompt for age during setup for themselves and never deal with age verification problems again. But these laws really need to put in print what the age verification process will be.

    11. Ok-Nerve9874 on

      shouldve passsed an age restriction bill and then later on justified the creation of a state department based on this age bill. They going direct with it. wonder if it will pass now

    14. GamingWithBilly on

      So we’re going to block all content on the Internet to save the children?  Nice

      So long as I’ll no longer be told how much my mother was ruined by 9yr olds in my online games.

    17. wowlock_taylan on

      All the ‚age verification‘ bullshit’s goal was ALWAYS this. They don’t give a damn about protecting kids. They are literal pedos.

    18. Charkid17 on

      With each passing day I get more and more sure the voting age should be dramatically lowered.

    19. thelonetwig on

      Time for hard copies again. Fuck them and support local used bookstores.

    Leave A Reply