Arbeiter berichten, dass sie sich Ray-Ban-Meta-Aufnahmen von Menschen angesehen haben, die die Toilette benutzen
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/03/workers-report-watching-ray-ban-meta-shot-footage-of-people-using-the-bathroom/
Arbeiter berichten, dass sie sich Ray-Ban-Meta-Aufnahmen von Menschen angesehen haben, die die Toilette benutzen
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/03/workers-report-watching-ray-ban-meta-shot-footage-of-people-using-the-bathroom/
34 Kommentare
The Meta Clusterfuck
Oh nooooo, the device I bought to constantly record other people is actually also spying on me, oh nooooooo.
How many other companies out there doing this same thing, but aren’t attached to notoriety like meta and will never have any repercussions or change their product.
Anybody that believes Zuck isn’t spying on and recording every single thing you do with these stupid things regardless of settings or options is a fool. Meta is not a technology company, they are a data harvesting company.
So much free data for them to use, abuse and sell.
Facebook, the company created by a drunk college punk who wanted to rate women based on physical appearances and today acts only as a succubus to steal everyone else’s personal data, created a product that would lead to this???
Now imagine just how much louder the howling would be if Meta was a Chinese company.
sorry but are these people like, brain-damaged? what did they think was going to happen with glasses that have a fucking always-on camera? and why would anyone want to wear that in the first place?
What is this obsession with toilets?
As a glasses wearer for my entire life, I still don’t understand why anyone would buy these?
Might see the appeal if they didn’t record video/audio like an AR display/HUD but even then it’s a stretch.
>“I saw a video where a man puts the glasses on the bedside table and leaves the room. Shortly afterwards, his wife comes in and changes her clothes,” an anonymous Sama employee reportedly said, per the machine translation.
>Another anonymous employee said that they have seen users’ partners come out of the bathroom naked.
Using it as a spy cam to get nudes of your spouse suggests extremely healthy relationships. Or perhaps people creating consensual but pseudo-voyeuristic videos as kink content and not realizing that the glasses aren’t „just“ a camera?
The hilarious part is the battery only lasts maybe 20 minutes if you were constantly recording video. People think these things have decent battery life they’ll die just wearing them throughout the day and just casually using them as headphones for a couple of hours.
HR departments need to start writing policies and banning these now.
The amount of people that willingly buy these and also outfit their entire house out with ring doorbells and etc. is astounding. I’m going to completely ruin my privacy so I can catch that one guy that one time who stole a package of $3 sharpie pins I ordered from Amazon in 2014.
[deleted]
Why aren’t smart glasses required to be conspicuously labeled?
I wouldn’t even want to have a face to face conversation with somebody wearing those.
i wonder how much their stock will drop when the inevitable leak hits and we have the next fappening
Zuckerberg really is the greatest Salesman, selling people 500$+ glasses to become part of his peepshow
This is what you get when you’re stupid enough to walk around with some company’s camera attached to your face. If you assume they’re not recording things they shouldn’t, you’re not being responsible enough with your own privacy.
I don’t care what they *tell* you.
I don’t care if there are *laws* against it.
These companies are in the business of data-harvesting. You are their *product*, not their customer. Even if they make every promise in the world *today*, you’ll never go broke betting either that they’ll change their policy later or that a “mistake” will be made such that they’ll “accidentally” record things they shouldn’t.
Trusting these companies is always a mistake.
Meta is soon to be the world’s largest holder of kompromat.
Who buys these things?
A relationship/friendship of mine died because of these glasses. A friend who I hadn’t seen for a while came over to my place wearing these monstrosities. Frankly, I’d never seen them before irl, and don’t really follow FB tech news, so he was here for about an hour when I finally broached the uncomfortable topic of his hideous glasses. I kind of hope Meta saw my reaction. Anyway, it cemented an unpleasant feeling I’ve had about the guy for a long time. His incredulous attitude towards Meta was very telling. I’d love to send him this article, but we’re done.
There needs to be federal mandate that these kinds of devices must have an auditory and visual warning and that disabling them is subject to prosecution.
We have more than one person at my workplace that starting wearing them to essentially file complaints on people to extort the employer for money.
We HAVE to shun these glassholes in public every chance we get. We cannot normalize this
But because it’s an American company no one will ever hear of this news or care. Americans crave getting spied on as long as it’s by their own country.
[*”Security Breaaaach”*](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRiSsJdyCr0)
there’s a shocker…
If you are dumb enough to wear Facebook cameras on your face, you deserve a privacy breach.
Like for funzies?
Using the bathroom isn’t even the worst thing said. They’ve mentioned watching people have sex and get undressed even when they put the glasses on the beside. They’ve talked about seeing people’s credit cards and bank details. They’ve said that even privacy filters fail frequently so faces etc get seen.
These things are essentially just like those illegal Chinese hotel spy cameras making voyeur content but this time people are buying them to broadcast themselves.
as in, the people wearing the glasses are recording themselves on the toilet, uploading it to meta cloud and then watching themselves?
Hey meta, is this blood?
How else is Meta gonna use AI to make voyeur porn in a few years? Think of the profits stop caring about silly privacy