Der Oberste Gerichtshof der USA ist nicht daran interessiert, das Urheberrecht für KI-generierte Bilder durchzusetzen
https://www.techspot.com/news/111553-us-supreme-court-not-interested-enforcing-copyright-ai.html
Der Oberste Gerichtshof der USA ist nicht daran interessiert, das Urheberrecht für KI-generierte Bilder durchzusetzen
https://www.techspot.com/news/111553-us-supreme-court-not-interested-enforcing-copyright-ai.html
7 Kommentare
Clankers don’t have rights. Yet.
because ai can’t make art, it doesn’t under perform popularity
Dude tried to get the AI system the copyright. Nope, you need to at least do some manual modification for that and hold the copyright yourself.
The purpose of copyright is to incentivize new creative works. But in a world where AI can generate a virtually infinite supply of creative works, there is no need to incentivize it.
US courts barely *enforce* copyright for human-created works, so no surprise here. When is the last time anyone asked permission to post something on the web?
Problem here is AI is going to use code to deliver images that are similar. There’s no way for you to know that. If you could copyright every AI image it would be a fucking fest of lawsuits.
You create, you get a copyright.
Machines create, fuck off it’s for anybody.
The only way it’s going to work.
Nor should it