Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Bluesky Threads Das sollte jeden beunruhigen. Von ReasonableChaos27
BossCurious9681 on 06.03.2026 12:12 a.m. Noem said the same thing albeit from the government’s perspective, this isn’t a gotcha moment
Balzmcgurkin on 06.03.2026 12:13 a.m. Should, but won’t. Turns out the freedom loving right was harboring all the authoritarians this whole time.
ArtichokeOwn2410 on 06.03.2026 12:25 a.m. Technicality. Noem had it right. This shouldn’t worry anyone.
everydaycarrie on 06.03.2026 12:26 a.m. Noem is so incredibly intellectually deficient. If our government is going to become tyrannical, at least they are putting forward people who can easily be outsmarted..
HasaDiga_Eebowai on 06.03.2026 12:38 a.m. It would be incorrect if she said „right to *unlawful* search and seizure“. She got it a little twisted by she’s not far off
ImpliedRange on 06.03.2026 12:58 a.m. It guarantees you the right to *only* lawfully face search and seizure Have you ever tried to speak in public, this is a nothingburger
Flickedbic on 06.03.2026 2:08 a.m. You have the right to be searched. Anything you do not allowed to be searched will be held against you.
rubberbootsandwetsox on 06.03.2026 2:09 a.m. What are they expected to read and understand that thingy they took an oath to uphold?? Get outta here!
FrancescoPlays on 06.03.2026 2:19 a.m. Lawful search and seizure sounds like protection against unreasonable/unlawful search and seizure to me tbh.
12 Kommentare
Noem said the same thing albeit from the government’s perspective, this isn’t a gotcha moment
Should, but won’t. Turns out the freedom loving right was harboring all the authoritarians this whole time.
[ Removed by Reddit ]
Technicality. Noem had it right. This shouldn’t worry anyone.
Noem is so incredibly intellectually deficient.
If our government is going to become tyrannical, at least they are putting forward people who can easily be outsmarted..
It would be incorrect if she said „right to *unlawful* search and seizure“. She got it a little twisted by she’s not far off
They both said the same thing
It guarantees you the right to *only* lawfully face search and seizure
Have you ever tried to speak in public, this is a nothingburger
Both are saying the same thing…
You have the right to be searched. Anything you do not allowed to be searched will be held against you.
What are they expected to read and understand that thingy they took an oath to uphold?? Get outta here!
Lawful search and seizure sounds like protection against unreasonable/unlawful search and seizure to me tbh.