Berichten zufolge soll die KI-Displaybrille von Meta intime Videos mit menschlichen Moderatoren teilen
https://www.engadget.com/ai/metas-ai-display-glasses-reportedly-share-intimate-videos-with-human-moderators-135939855.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw&tsrc=twtr
31 Kommentare
> Employees in Kenya doing AI „annotation“ told the journalists that they’ve seen people nude, using the toilet and engaging in sexual activity, along with credit card numbers and other sensitive information.
I mean, **no shit**.
These are glasses with cameras on them made by a company infamous for collecting and exploiting user data.
Simply by wearing them, you’ve compromised your own privacy and the privacy of those around you as well.
What did you expect?
What an incredible breach of privacy. I’ve already started my meta boycott, as have many of my friends and family. They won’t last long if they continue down this path.
Oh hell naw. OH HELL NAW.
Ah, the POV porn generator for AI content.
Does Reddit have a „least surprising post of the day“ award?
Adoy. Has nobody understood that FB has amassed so much money by selling info about you?
And now they sell monitoring devices to what, exactly, if not more of what they’ve always done?
Gee r/noshitsherlock
And you can only imagine what the VR headsets are doing with the environment mapping technology.
People really don’t hate ghouls like Zuckerberg enough.
Two questions:
1. Why would anyone wear these while being intimate with someone or while going to the bathroom?
2. What benefit do these provide in non-intimate situations?
I forget the movie wherein one of the characters outlines how humans are perverted by design.
Is anyone surprised? Remember meta sold you out to Cambridge Analytics.
Shocked Pikachu face.gif
Lol this was expected
Seriously, why would anyone even buy pointless shit like this?
They are also against company policy at alot of places already.
THEY’RE GLASSES WITH CAMERAS GLUED ONTO THEM
WHAT DID YOU THINK WAS GOING TO HAPPEN
Are there any HUD smart glasses without a camera? I like the idea of the ray-ban display, but I don’t want/need cameras.
Weirdos like Zuckerberg can’t be trusted
Imagine buying these and putting them on your face.
The most surprising part of this story is that people who buy these stupid things are having sex.
I mean of course. Obviously. Anyone who bought those thinking Meta was being cognizant of privacy is a rube.
If you buy a camera that has to connect to a server that isn’t yours to get features, assume everything is public.
Someone made an app that alerts you if someone has these on.
Why the fuck exactly do I need a review of what I literally see with my own glasses?!
Why anyone still uses anything attached to large tech companies like Facebook (I will never call them the M-word it’s stupid) and Amazon is beyond me. We know they’re spying on us. We know they’re listening and watching everything. Yet people invite them into their houses and apartments without question.
If anyone is shocked after reading this, they’re an idiot.
Wait wait, so the man who created a website to numerically dehumanize women based solely on their fuckability based on male opinion is violating people’s privacy?
Oh my!
If you’re stupid enough to wear Zuckerberg‘s camera glasses then I guess you get what you deserve
Unless the wearer is easily identifiable, this is simply exploitation and should be banned.
I mean no shit. What kind of idiot would actually buy these?
My shocked face, let me show you it