Der MAGA-Plan zur Zerstörung Kanadas

>“There is an ideological alignment with Trump,” Bratt said. “On gun rights, climate change, trans rights, renewable energy, wokeness … it’s all consistent with American right-wing movements.”

This is hard to overlook and ignore from outside the Province, though many seem to deny it from within the Province. When *scientific consensus* and *well-respected research* cannot be seen to hold sway over policy, it speaks to a deeper and broader lack of consensus of support for science within the population.

>Her government massively [lowered the threshold of signatures required](https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/smith-lowers-bar-for-alberta-referendum-with-separatism-sentiment-emerging) to put the question to a vote, and [overrode a court decision deeming a referendum unconstitutional](https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/alberta-premier-danielle-smith-says-courts-should-not-be-gatekeepers-on-independence-questions-9.7006383). She has repeatedly [refused to denounce](https://x.com/JSJamato/status/2016996569523114350) those who would break up the country and reportedly said she’d [stay on as prime minister](https://thetyee.ca/News/2026/01/30/Separatist-Says-Premier-Smith-Talked-Leading-Independent-Alberta/) of an independent Alberta.

Many of us see this. It bothers me that few politicians of note are willing to confront her on it; though my Premier, Eby, certainly made headlines recently when he referred to the separatists as *traitors.*

>“The core people driving this are perennially aggrieved. They are always angry about something,” said Jason Kenney, Smith’s predecessor as premier and founder of the UCP.

Which is why I believe that attempting to placate Alberta is a pointless waste of time and energy. We paid billions upon billions for a new pipeline for them, and in return there was not a meaningful moment of abatement in their grievance-driven demands. What’s the point in attempting appeasement when appeasement efforts thus far have yielded *nothing*?

>Though Rath claims he wants independence, not statehood, he has suggested Alberta could switch to the U.S. dollar, and deploy American border enforcement to carry out [mass deportations](https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/alta-next-panel-1.7619779) in the province. In March of last year, he even [talked up the benefits of a status less than statehood](https://x.com/Emmanuel_Rach/status/1897413397773475860?fbclid=IwY2xjawQBbaFleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETJZRVFsN0lXYTBsMWtVRlNnc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHhA4fwU-7y7OmI4NnmuLTSiTsluw-h6LIOKvDAYPbzzcoH9-BT3nceQk1NMc_aem_3S-vDUqzmA9knn76mDy4vw), saying U.S. territories like Puerto Rico and Guam at least do not pay federal tax.

That’s what this ultimately comes to, isn’t it? The desire to use force to forcibly remove people that they dislike, with the discretion of selection being theirs when granted independence; and leaping at the possibility to pay less in taxes, *regardless of the cost.*

>But if that faction is large enough, it might not matter what they want. Lennox sees [troubling parallels](https://substack.com/home/post/p-183841109) between America’s engagements with the APP and [Russia’s tactics in Ukraine’s Donbass region](https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/alberta-separatism-trump-administration-9.7068999?__vfz=medium%3Dsharebar), which laid the groundwork for a more forceful annexation.

>If a “no” vote is narrow enough, Rath and his American backers could claim the result is “rigged,” necessitating the “liberation” of an oppressed minority—and its valuable strategic resources.

I don’t think the margins need be all that narrow, if the USA is willing to „*assist*“ at all. The clear majority of Ukrainians did not want to have territory annexed by Russia, but that didn’t stop Russia from claiming that the vast majority of those in the contested territories supported annexation, and using that as an excuse to invade and attack all of Ukraine.

Imagine if the referendum shows that areas *outside of* Calgary and Edmonton were largely in favour of separation while the urban areas strongly opposed. The clear majority of Albertans could oppose annexation, but if the USA applied similar logic as Russia they’d seek to take the whole of the province.

Scott Besssnt , United States Secretary of the Treasury met with the separatists and called Alberta a „natural partner for the U.S“.

The same Scott Bessent who said he was responsible for causing Iran’s currency to crash thus causing the recent mass protests.

See a pattern here ?

Canada will be ok. The vast majority of us are intelligent, and we can see through bullshit. The more they try the stronger we get.

Canada will be fine. We’re a strong, wealthy country with robust institutions, an educated populace, and a vibrant culture. We aren’t dumb enough to throw it all away. I’m not worried.