Belgien sagt, dass das Vorgehen der USA und Israels gegen den Iran „nicht den Standards des Völkerrechts entspricht“.

https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/belgium-says-us-israel-action-on-iran-does-not-meet-international-law-standards/3846552

Share.

27 Kommentare

  1. Farewell-Farewell on

    I think Iran should have been allowed to develop nukes. Can you imagine the lawyers complaining about international law when the world is really in flames and the Ayatollah detonates Brussels?

    On a serious note. International law is important, but the current mecahnics of the UN and other bodies have proven that it does not work. Russia has been breaking every rule in the book, and there have been no consequences. The Iranian regime publically supports terror and murders thousands of people, and all the UN can do is look the other way.

  2. Ancient_Mud_2841 on

    If international law was backed by international accountability this war would not have been necessary.

  3. Sufficient-Tutor-922 on

    Lol just stop feeding the left voting demographic this bullshit please.

    This type of bullshit talk is exactly what has kept any real discussion of solutions of reality for the region .

    If this war/operation is successful then America owns Iran and Isreal owns Gaza and the world have it to them on platter .

  4. Iran doesnt even think to ask EU, UN or NATO for complaints, advice or demands. It retaliated by bombing neighbors and NATO.

    Now, did Iran meet international law standards? Or is international law a toy, the powerful use, to make the less powerful comply?

  5. What about 40 years of calling for the death and destruction of another country and taking actions by the funding and training of terror groups and dictatorship.

    If someone tell you they want to kill you and nothing is helping, than you should have every right to make sure they can’t do it.

  6. NegevThunderstorm on

    Well call the police cause Im not sure iran was ever following international law

  7. So what? International law is nothing but pointless hot air without enforcement power. Is anyone really going to bother with it. Putin is a war criminal. Is he going to be arrested any time soon?

  8. Effective-Tour-9912 on

    Where are they going to put people who break „international law?“ The international jail??

  9. DiscipleOfYeshua on

    Careful not to speak too loudly, the dying IRGC is shooting random missiles and drones even at Europe now…

  10. jwisestayswise on

    Since when was Iran following international law? Was massacring 30k civilians part of international law? Why do some have to abide by the rules but others not?

  11. HighOverlordXenu on

    Do something about it or shut up.

    Laws only matter when they’re enforced. The last ten years have taught us this lesson quite thoroughly.

  12. europe is so castrated it’s hilarious. one more strongly worded letter and the hostilities will certainly stop

  13. jakemufcfan on

    This is my problem (as a British person) with the UK and EU’s response to everything rn. They complain that it doesn’t adhere to a rules based order that has not existed for a long time. Longer than Trump. An order that they were part of breaking, ultimately the rules are what the US makes them as they have the strength to enforce it. Sad reality but its the hand we’ve been dealt with

  14. The article doesn’t really explain his reasoning, if it was even provided. 

  15. If “international law” cannot prevent 30k protesters from being massacred, but does protect the regime so Khamenei can continue to execute people without consequences, then it must die. “International law” in the past was a tool to empower totalitarians and dictators, but constrain democracies.

    Besides, Belgium is insignificant. When will it meet the defense spending requirements in NATO?

  16. tropic_gnome_hunter on

    There is no such thing as international law. Harry Potter is more real than international law.

  17. call-the-wizards on

    What was international law doing last month when the Islamic republic was committing crimes against humanity against its own citizens?

  18. The UK PM said something similar and immediately gave the US permission to launch attacks from UK bases. Obviously if he truly believed the war was „illegal“ he wouldn’t immediately agree to participate.

    European nations still live in the rosy fantasy land where they are so completely protected and served by American military power, they can’t even recognize it. Bold enough to mouth off about it, but not bold enough to make the sacrifices necessary to exercise independent military power.

Leave A Reply