Almost like the rest of the world has a building code…..
kainedbutable1987 on
No dancing in front of it to make it fall lol
Dismal_Associate1 on
Way too many variables for this to be a legit conversation
_Wildpinkler_ on
The airplane that hit twin towers had nukes duh
Beni_Stingray on
Bad comparison but we appreciate the thought.
maestro-5838 on
A toddler slapping vs Brock Lesnar slapping your face. Which will bring you down
killersloth65 on
Notice how the guys handle is „laddin“
Nonamanadus on
A fire can do way more damage than an explosion, that is why fire bombing Tokyo work a lot better than dropping high explosives. The Dresden BBQ is another good example.
Rhodesianzoomer on
A Boeing 747 & a drone are two different things dude horrible comparison lmaoo
seanddd99 on
Not the best example
Jakelell on
From armchair ballistic experts „analyzing“ the bullet that hit Charlie Kirk, now we’re back to the classics: Armchair architects!
Castrophenia on
Me when a drone missile hits a modern building and it doesn’t behave like buildings from the 70s being hit by an airliner
PersiusAlloy on
Mr Jihadi on X thinks a commercial airbus and that drone equal the same weight and had the same velocity flying into two completely different structures lmfao
CanThisBeMyNameMaybe on
Something something drones dont use jet fuel something
Responsible_Rice2101 on
9/11 was inside job
InterestedObserver48 on
Boxer gets punched by his opponent and falls down, boxer gets punched by a three year old and doesn’t fall down….thats weird
WildTurkeyTater on
Jet Fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel. Argument over.
mitchman1973 on
It’s funny how people always notice this the WTC building destruction still hasn’t been explained. The NIST NCSTAR report debunked the hot fires weakening steel theory, so we have literally no explanation for wtc 1 and 2 and wtc 7 is so bad it’s hilarious
Conserp on
A building next to it – the one that wasn’t hit at all – didn’t collapse either. Shocker.
FentOverOxyAllDay on
The missile that hit that apartment was only a 100 pound explosive on a shahed.
On its best day it could level a single family home so ofc it’s not going to take down an entire skyscraper.
This isn’t even up for debate.
RedHeadRedemption93 on
Has no one here seen any of the hundreds of videos from Ukraine showing drone strikes into high rise buildings and I don’t think I’ve seen any collapse.
FentOverOxyAllDay on
A shahed weighs around 440 lbs, with its biggest payload topping 100 lbs, meaning it’s under 600 altogether.
A 767 weighs empty 187,000 lbs, full over 300,000.
There is more explosive power in a half fueled 767 then a 600 lb shahed.
I think 9/11 was bs, but this isn’t the argument you wanna use to try to prove anything about 9/11.
realitysvt on
only steel skyscraper to ever collapse
MassiveResult2648 on
I don’t know if you knew this but a drone and a passenger aircraft flying at 500 plus miles per hour differ in size by a lot
charliehustle757 on
This was also cgi/ai video. I saw
mowglee365 on
Different structure?
South-Rabbit-4064 on
I think a photo of a drone next to an aircraft is also needed here
Loose_Gripper69 on
Drone fuel really doesn’t melt steel beams.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
37 Kommentare
Modern-day buildings are made to withstand strikes like those, not sure the reason to fake an explosion killing nobody of relevance.
To be fair a drone and 700 series aircraft are nowhere similar in size
Twin towers and 7 were disintegrated with electromagnetic pulse weapons
Was it hit by a 747 full of fuel?
🤦♂️
Hmmm a drone vs a 747…. HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Something something something plane fuel something….
Dank memes melt steel beams
Apples and oranges buddy. CIA wasn’t involved
Almost like the rest of the world has a building code…..
No dancing in front of it to make it fall lol
Way too many variables for this to be a legit conversation
The airplane that hit twin towers had nukes duh
Bad comparison but we appreciate the thought.
A toddler slapping vs Brock Lesnar slapping your face. Which will bring you down
Notice how the guys handle is „laddin“
A fire can do way more damage than an explosion, that is why fire bombing Tokyo work a lot better than dropping high explosives. The Dresden BBQ is another good example.
A Boeing 747 & a drone are two different things dude horrible comparison lmaoo
Not the best example
From armchair ballistic experts „analyzing“ the bullet that hit Charlie Kirk, now we’re back to the classics: Armchair architects!
Me when a drone missile hits a modern building and it doesn’t behave like buildings from the 70s being hit by an airliner
Mr Jihadi on X thinks a commercial airbus and that drone equal the same weight and had the same velocity flying into two completely different structures lmfao
Something something drones dont use jet fuel something
9/11 was inside job
Boxer gets punched by his opponent and falls down, boxer gets punched by a three year old and doesn’t fall down….thats weird
Jet Fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel. Argument over.
It’s funny how people always notice this the WTC building destruction still hasn’t been explained. The NIST NCSTAR report debunked the hot fires weakening steel theory, so we have literally no explanation for wtc 1 and 2 and wtc 7 is so bad it’s hilarious
A building next to it – the one that wasn’t hit at all – didn’t collapse either. Shocker.
The missile that hit that apartment was only a 100 pound explosive on a shahed.
On its best day it could level a single family home so ofc it’s not going to take down an entire skyscraper.
This isn’t even up for debate.
Has no one here seen any of the hundreds of videos from Ukraine showing drone strikes into high rise buildings and I don’t think I’ve seen any collapse.
A shahed weighs around 440 lbs, with its biggest payload topping 100 lbs, meaning it’s under 600 altogether.
A 767 weighs empty 187,000 lbs, full over 300,000.
There is more explosive power in a half fueled 767 then a 600 lb shahed.
I think 9/11 was bs, but this isn’t the argument you wanna use to try to prove anything about 9/11.
only steel skyscraper to ever collapse
I don’t know if you knew this but a drone and a passenger aircraft flying at 500 plus miles per hour differ in size by a lot
This was also cgi/ai video. I saw
Different structure?
I think a photo of a drone next to an aircraft is also needed here
Drone fuel really doesn’t melt steel beams.