Kanada sollte keine Wahlen abhalten, bevor das CUSMA-Handelsabkommen überprüft wird, sagt Poilievre
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-election-interview-the-bridge-floor-crosser-washington-trump-usa-9.7110025
Kanada sollte keine Wahlen abhalten, bevor das CUSMA-Handelsabkommen überprüft wird, sagt Poilievre
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-election-interview-the-bridge-floor-crosser-washington-trump-usa-9.7110025
8 Kommentare
How convenient for Poilievre to say that one of the most difficult files coming up should be completed before another election.
>“I think that being united will be a real force going forward,“ Poilievre said, before immediately turning around to trash Carney.
Pierre saying he doesn’t want an election is an open confession that his own team knows he would absolutely lose.
Surprisingly mature response from Polievre, which bails him out of an unsustainable position in the polls and within his own party. Wouldn’t be a terrible idea for Carney to take him up on it, including the BQ and rump NDP.
Ahh yes. Let’s reopen the keystone xl conversation. This guy is just Petro state like Maga lady in Alberta. Do they offer anything else, ever? It’s like they’re stuck in the past. By the time we build that thing, even more of the world will have been moving away from oil. Even gas is being replaced. It’s inevitable. O&g is going the way of coal. It’ll be used less and less and therefore costs will go down and profits, too. Even if that takes 30 years, it’ll take 10 years just to build the pipeline because the other provinces just don’t care, they don’t want it.
Well ya. The cusma negotiations are likely to go sour and cause serious economic issues. Carney is riding high now but may not be when the ndp has a new leader and people are wondering why things are getting worse
Actually not a bad policy idea. But, I don’t suspect for a second he’s saying this because it’s good for Canada.
But he’s set a trap for himself. If Carney actually follows this advice, and we have an election over CUSMA, Canadians have roughly two options: the Liberals and whatever trade deal they could get, or the Tories and… What, exactly will Poilievre run on? Condemn the deal, and convince Canadians that he’ll get a better one??
That’s a laugh. The Tories have fewer actual ideas that most Canadians would support than the Bloc or NDP. The Conservatives haven’t been advocates of new ideas or a government that would *do* things since the Mulroney era.
Anyhow, we’ll see. But Poilievre’s remark reminds me of the adage that even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Awfully funny stance from a guy who was adamant he force an election when we were facing annexation and new tariffs every day at the start of trumps term
Isn’t his statement and admission that he’s not up to the task of leading.
He’s saying: let the current PM do the hard stuff so I can criticize him, instead of saying that he wants to do the hard stuff because he’s a leader.
This sums up his whole philosophy and what he thinks politics is.