Sweden could allow nuclear weapons on its territory in wartime, Defense Minister Pal Jonson said, in a sign that one of the former champions of disarmament is warming up to a greater role in European nuclear deterrence.
The Nordic state was among the early signatories of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1968 and has been a leading proponent of strengthening the treaty, while it does not have a law against nuclear weapons on its territory.
“If there were to be war, we would naturally consider any option that could secure Sweden’s survival and Swedish security,” Jonson said in an interview with Swedish radio SR on Friday.
Aethernath on
And in peacetime as a deterrent please.
MrCinnamon-420 on
Every single country in Europe should have nuclear weapons.
Caspica on
Paywall.
mats_o42 on
As a Swede Yes Please
CommercialOnly2674 on
Need a joint nordic nuclear program. Hosting few nukes from unreliable ally wont be enough.
thelonelypratham on
This is a massive but completely necessary shift in policy. You cannot join a nuclear alliance like NATO and then pretend you are above the realities of nuclear deterrence. If war actually breaks out, having geographical flexibility for the nuclear umbrella in the Nordics is a crucial strategic advantage. It is definitely a shock to Sweden’s traditional disarmament stance, but the security landscape of Europe has fundamentally changed.
swainiscadianreborn on
Hm.
Yeah you want the bonuses of the nuclear weapon but not the downsides (maintenance beeing one). Not sure I approve.
Ice-Penguin1 on
Full article:
Sweden could allow nuclear weapons on its territory in wartime, Defense Minister Pal Jonson said, in a sign that one of the former champions of disarmament is warming up to a greater role in European nuclear deterrence.
The Nordic state was among the early signatories of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1968 and has been a leading proponent of strengthening the treaty, while it does not have a law against nuclear weapons on its territory.
“If there were to be war, we would naturally consider any option that could secure Sweden’s survival and Swedish security,” Jonson said in an interview with Swedish radio SR on Friday.
Sweden’s leaders have made several comments over recent weeks cautiously suggesting an openness to a bigger role in European nuclear deterrence amid growing concern about the unreliability of the US as a military ally.
Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said in late January that his nation had held discussions with Europe’s two nuclear-armed states, France and the UK, about nuclear deterrence.
“France has shown an openness to discuss with other countries,” he said, but declined to give more details on the talks.
The largest Nordic nation began developing its own capacity to make nuclear weapons after WWII but stopped in the 1960s after political opposition intensified and costs rose. Swedish diplomat Alva Myrdal shared the Nobel Peace Prize in 1982 with Alfonso Garcia Robles for their work for disarmament and nuclear and weapon-free zones.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
9 Kommentare
*From Bloomberg News reporter Charlie Duxbury:*
Sweden could allow nuclear weapons on its territory in wartime, Defense Minister Pal Jonson said, in a sign that one of the former champions of disarmament is warming up to a greater role in European nuclear deterrence.
The Nordic state was among the early signatories of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1968 and has been a leading proponent of strengthening the treaty, while it does not have a law against nuclear weapons on its territory.
“If there were to be war, we would naturally consider any option that could secure Sweden’s survival and Swedish security,” Jonson said in an interview with Swedish radio SR on Friday.
And in peacetime as a deterrent please.
Every single country in Europe should have nuclear weapons.
Paywall.
As a Swede Yes Please
Need a joint nordic nuclear program. Hosting few nukes from unreliable ally wont be enough.
This is a massive but completely necessary shift in policy. You cannot join a nuclear alliance like NATO and then pretend you are above the realities of nuclear deterrence. If war actually breaks out, having geographical flexibility for the nuclear umbrella in the Nordics is a crucial strategic advantage. It is definitely a shock to Sweden’s traditional disarmament stance, but the security landscape of Europe has fundamentally changed.
Hm.
Yeah you want the bonuses of the nuclear weapon but not the downsides (maintenance beeing one). Not sure I approve.
Full article:
Sweden could allow nuclear weapons on its territory in wartime, Defense Minister Pal Jonson said, in a sign that one of the former champions of disarmament is warming up to a greater role in European nuclear deterrence.
The Nordic state was among the early signatories of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1968 and has been a leading proponent of strengthening the treaty, while it does not have a law against nuclear weapons on its territory.
“If there were to be war, we would naturally consider any option that could secure Sweden’s survival and Swedish security,” Jonson said in an interview with Swedish radio SR on Friday.
Sweden’s leaders have made several comments over recent weeks cautiously suggesting an openness to a bigger role in European nuclear deterrence amid growing concern about the unreliability of the US as a military ally.
Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said in late January that his nation had held discussions with Europe’s two nuclear-armed states, France and the UK, about nuclear deterrence.
“France has shown an openness to discuss with other countries,” he said, but declined to give more details on the talks.
The largest Nordic nation began developing its own capacity to make nuclear weapons after WWII but stopped in the 1960s after political opposition intensified and costs rose. Swedish diplomat Alva Myrdal shared the Nobel Peace Prize in 1982 with Alfonso Garcia Robles for their work for disarmament and nuclear and weapon-free zones.