Über 7.000 Schusswaffen im „Angriffsstil“ wurden von Britisch-Kolumbianern gemeldet, die sich für ein Rückkaufprogramm beworben haben
https://www.cbc.ca/news/assault-riffle-b-c-buyback-program-9.7104578
Über 7.000 Schusswaffen im „Angriffsstil“ wurden von Britisch-Kolumbianern gemeldet, die sich für ein Rückkaufprogramm beworben haben
https://www.cbc.ca/news/assault-riffle-b-c-buyback-program-9.7104578
27 Kommentare
Tagged as national news because the article does talk about national numbers.
I’d also like to point out this inaccuracy:
> So far, 32,000 declarations have been submitted nationwide, accounting for 23 per cent of the estimated 136,000 outlawed firearms the program aims to buyback.
The 136,000 number is just the AR-15s. I’ve seen estimates that the total actual number banned including the previously unregistered non-restricted rifles is as many as 3,000,000. So nowhere near 23% compliance.
I wonder how much of that number is from the business buyback that happened earlier this year and the feds are using those numbers to help make it look like a success? Still 7,000 firearms from the 340,000 licensed legal gun owners in British Columbia isn’t an impressive number.
Industry estimates of 1-3 million newly prohibited firearms of 32 000 registered. This is ultimately confiscation not „buyback“. Way to miss the mark CBC (we knew they would). 136 000 is basically only previously registered restricted and does not include the mountains of previously non-restricted that have no registration.
We know they are lying. They know they are lying. Yet the media refuses to hold these people to the fire.
Realistically, this is like you promise your mom you will buy 2 million strawberries, and you came home with 32 berries in a plastic box and said well, that was a big achievement!
Only online do I ever see so much hostility to the concept of getting guns off the streets. IRL anyone I’ve ever talked to about this is just ahppy to know they’re less guns floating around.
What does „assault style“ mean exactly?
“Assault style” = a gun i would never hunt with
(Because its a .22lr that is a glorified popcangun
It’s basically still just a paperwork exercise, the government has only vaguely tossed around the idea of mobile collection units staffed by RCMP reserves.
„With the number of individual police departments and even entire provinces and territories that don’t want to contribute resources to it, I think it’s very difficult,“ he said.
„Who’s going to get the gun, and who’s going to put it somewhere, and where are you going to put it? And what are they going to do with it afterwards? I think a lot of people in the firearms community feel that the government doesn’t know the answer to those questions.“
Millions spent, barely anyone complying. At what point does the government admit this buyback is a failure and rethink the approach? I hope owners continue to not comply until the feds end this stupid prohibition.
Right.
How many are business buy backs?
Ooof. Going to be an unhappy thread with that many guns being declared.
Here is a different way to look at it, per capita:
Province-Territory / Declared Firearms / Est. Population / Rate per 100,000
Yukon / 64 / 48,261 / 132.61
British Columbia / 7,368 / 5,683,201 / 129.65
Ontario / 13,219 / 16,191,372 / 81.64
Northwest Territories / 35 / 45,848 / 76.34
Nova Scotia / 785 / 1,091,857 / 71.90
New Brunswick / 575 / 868,630 / 66.20
Quebec / 5,539 / 9,058,089 / 61.15
Manitoba / 912 / 1,507,057 / 60.52
Alberta / 2,730 / 5,040,871 / 54.16
Newfoundland & Labrador / 236 / 549,738 / 42.93
Prince Edward Island / 77 / 182,508 / 42.19
Saskatchewan / 459 / 1,266,234 / 36.25
Nunavut / <10 / 41,919 / ~4
Compared to all the issues that we face in Canada, and the inaction to fix them by our federal and provincial governments, this one doesn’t even rate, but somehow it’s the one that people have fixated on and even started separation movements around.
so a caveat to this headline….they have not made clear if these are individuals or businesses that account for this.
I am going to guess mostly businesses.
Also, of their total budget, only a fraction was set aside for actual buyback payouts and even those are not at par with the purchase price, another misnomer.
this buy back program has cost tax payers billions over I don’t how many years.
bottom line, illegal guns are the real issue, from the US, not the law abiding, registered canadian citizens…..
I LOVE firearms. I really do. I will never OWN a firearm.
BMW 128i.
Well, I hope all 7000 of those people change their mind and force the government to seize them instead.
If everyone did it, this program would collapse overnight.
They’re not getting mine, I can tell you that for free…. my cousin stole mine when he was out on multiple firearms charges. So he got $10k worth of my guns for free, he just had to serve 91 day (plus time served). Good thing he took them and kept them off the streets, oh wait.
How many were gun and hunting store stock?
the people in charge of firearm safety should all be fired … out of a cannon :v
„Style“ is doing a lot of heavy lifting here, given how many wooden-stocked (and even pink .22) firearms are considered assault „style“.
I’d rather see how many illegal guns were taken off the streets. Or firearms from individuals with past or future ill intent.
There’s that propaganda image again.
7000 guns too many. Way to bend over and take it
No more assaulting MFers out ere!
7000 out of potentially 11 million
Woooow those 7,000 declared guns in BC will definitely lower the car jackings and extortion shootings in the peel region!!!
It’s so good to see these law abiding licensed but also organized crime members willingly give up their guns because Gary started threatening them! I’m so proud of our public safety minister who had to recuse himself from all matters related to a foreign terrorist organization, my hero.