Menschen, die glauben, einen Beitrag zur Gesellschaft zu leisten, gehen eher wählen und engagieren sich in der Politik. Sie spendeten auch eher für politische Zwecke und engagierten sich ehrenamtlich für sie, verglichen mit Personen, die ihren Beitrag zur Gesellschaft als geringer einschätzten.

So the trick to dismantling a liberal democracy would be to make people at least *feel* like they are making basically no difference at all?

Total junk science, but anecdotally I think this is probably pretty accurate, but not because of the vague „people who believe they contribute to society, contribute to society more.“

Most people I know that are highly engaged in donating, politics, volunteering is probably more to do with socioeconomics and personal wellness; people with careers they are highly satisfied with, being overall content with „life,“ is more likely the cause.

Like people who have jobs they hate or are in unhappy relationships likely wouldn’t feel they contribute to society.

I know when I’m „happier,“ I tend to be more involved. I don’t think it’s this crazy self reflection. It borderline seems common sense. When you are content it’s easier to do, well anything. For most people donating, volunteering, charity work, political involvement (no I don’t just mean voting, but call banking, canvassing etc) is a *luxury*.

I had an old boss that was borderline a Disney character; loved his career, family, etc and legitimately felt it was important to do charity events and stuff all the time.

Likewise when I’m having rough patches, it’s much harder to „give back“ to society.

Take someone struggling with depression, financials, personal life, it’s probably more causation. You aren’t happy with life, so you probably don’t feel you owe society. (And I’m not saying wealthy people mean anything, it’s actually a small factor imo — but you’re not going to find too many people struggling to pay bills spending their free time at a charity)