Kash Patel is going to wank himself until his eyes go straight
wokyman on
Misread that as „nonsensical“ porn for a second. Not sure I want to know what that would look like.
rausrh on
no bigger.
even bigger.
damnit grok, make them huge!
Waylander0719 on
They didn’t get „the AI“ to hand it over they just subpoenaed the company for logs and got them. This is like asking google for your search history.
oasis48 on
Our personal FBI agents are going to start wanking it to us instead of with us.
WardenWolf on
I mean, that’s a perfectly reasonable request during an investigation. And to see if any reasonable safeguards could be put in place to identify and block this in the future.
Mxy2ptlk on
Kash will have fun with those!
Kraien on
I mean a glance at civitai would result in a lot more resources for them. This is so in line with being so out of touch with the times
JaySocials671 on
This is actually a good civil use of AI IN litigation
Unusual_Flounder2073 on
On the one hand good. Go after people like this. On the other had did they have a warrant. Was it limited to specific cases they were already investigating. Some major concerns on this. Yet another reason to not use AI. Especially Grok. Fuck Musk
AiDigitalPlayland on
“Hey, ugh… how can we do that?”
twenafeesh on
The FBI didn’t get Grok to do anything. Grok is a large language model – a collection of source code and training data. It doesn’t have agency, emotions, or novel thought. You can’t „get it to do something.“ You can subpoena X for the prompts, code, and training data like for any other computer program, and I’m sure that’s what the FBI actually did.
Edit: yup, first line of the story. Headlines really need to stop anthropomorphizing these statistical simulations we call large language models. They are not, and will never be, „intelligent.“
3v1lkr0w on
Now if only they’d do something about that sex offender and child rapist in the white house
klousGT on
I hate that Elon stole grok from us. Like Trump stole red hats.
iron_cortex on
They will undoubtedly test these extensively and make sure they generate as many images as possible for science.
amazinglover on
How many of those prompts is just Musk asking it to create videos of him fucking himself.
Aranthos-Faroth on
“Tuck regularly worked out with and texted with the woman and, according to the affidavit, secretly filmed her while she was working out in his garage.
Over the course of the last several months, Tuck swatted their home, made a series of anonymous reports to the man’s employer claiming that he was a child abuser and a drug addict, posed as the man and made a series of mass shooting and suicide threats.
Tuck also made a series of other threats and bizarre actions, which included reaching out to a funeral home to say that the man would be dead soon and sending threats to the man while posing as a member of Sector 16, a Russian hacking crew.
The FBI says that Tuck also allegedly used Grok to create a complaint about the woman’s husband that was then filed to the company he works for. “
Friar Tuck is fucking unhinged.
mvw2 on
(user): „Hey Grok, make porn of children.“
(Grok): „Ok.“
(user): „Well that was easy.“
(FBI watching user and Grok): (eyebrow furrowing intensifies)
Yes, I do wonder what wild prompts would ever make a terrible AI system do terrible things…must be so hard to trick innocent little AI to do bad, bad things. Oh wait…no it isn’t because AI is fucking retarded with a full on consult your doctor after 4 hours level of hard R on that one bud.
americanadiandrew on
*The FBI says that it received “prompts provided to GrokAI that generated approximately 200 pornographic videos of a woman who closely resembled VICTIM’s wife’s physical appearance.”*
That’s an interesting distinction. Is that still a crime if you’re not actually making nudes with a victims actual face? Obviously on top of everything else batshit crazy he did it’s just more evidence of his obsession. Or perhaps closely resembled is the legal way to say deepfakes.
TikiTraveler on
I’ve been using grok strictly to straighten Patels eyes and give him big milkers. Am I fucked?
dazedan_confused on
Correct me if in wrong, but I thought Grok wouldn’t make porn?
Merlins_Owl on
How long til they discover it’s GOP users and decide non consensual porn is okay.
Dudemanbrah84 on
Surprise they all came from Trump computer
LargeSinkholesInNYC on
xAI is a shit company.
nlewis4 on
Make boobies bigger, no bigger
JSpell on
Im sure its safe in the FBIs hands lol
x33storm on
Writing some text is non-consensual now?
It does nothing but generate stuff from Grok’s training data. If it’s trained on rape, that’s Musk you gotta get your hands on.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
28 Kommentare
What a surprise AI does what AI wants
Kash Patel is going to wank himself until his eyes go straight
Misread that as „nonsensical“ porn for a second. Not sure I want to know what that would look like.
no bigger.
even bigger.
damnit grok, make them huge!
They didn’t get „the AI“ to hand it over they just subpoenaed the company for logs and got them. This is like asking google for your search history.
Our personal FBI agents are going to start wanking it to us instead of with us.
I mean, that’s a perfectly reasonable request during an investigation. And to see if any reasonable safeguards could be put in place to identify and block this in the future.
Kash will have fun with those!
I mean a glance at civitai would result in a lot more resources for them. This is so in line with being so out of touch with the times
This is actually a good civil use of AI IN litigation
On the one hand good. Go after people like this. On the other had did they have a warrant. Was it limited to specific cases they were already investigating. Some major concerns on this. Yet another reason to not use AI. Especially Grok. Fuck Musk
“Hey, ugh… how can we do that?”
The FBI didn’t get Grok to do anything. Grok is a large language model – a collection of source code and training data. It doesn’t have agency, emotions, or novel thought. You can’t „get it to do something.“ You can subpoena X for the prompts, code, and training data like for any other computer program, and I’m sure that’s what the FBI actually did.
Edit: yup, first line of the story. Headlines really need to stop anthropomorphizing these statistical simulations we call large language models. They are not, and will never be, „intelligent.“
Now if only they’d do something about that sex offender and child rapist in the white house
I hate that Elon stole grok from us. Like Trump stole red hats.
They will undoubtedly test these extensively and make sure they generate as many images as possible for science.
How many of those prompts is just Musk asking it to create videos of him fucking himself.
“Tuck regularly worked out with and texted with the woman and, according to the affidavit, secretly filmed her while she was working out in his garage.
Over the course of the last several months, Tuck swatted their home, made a series of anonymous reports to the man’s employer claiming that he was a child abuser and a drug addict, posed as the man and made a series of mass shooting and suicide threats.
Tuck also made a series of other threats and bizarre actions, which included reaching out to a funeral home to say that the man would be dead soon and sending threats to the man while posing as a member of Sector 16, a Russian hacking crew.
The FBI says that Tuck also allegedly used Grok to create a complaint about the woman’s husband that was then filed to the company he works for. “
Friar Tuck is fucking unhinged.
(user): „Hey Grok, make porn of children.“
(Grok): „Ok.“
(user): „Well that was easy.“
(FBI watching user and Grok): (eyebrow furrowing intensifies)
Yes, I do wonder what wild prompts would ever make a terrible AI system do terrible things…must be so hard to trick innocent little AI to do bad, bad things. Oh wait…no it isn’t because AI is fucking retarded with a full on consult your doctor after 4 hours level of hard R on that one bud.
*The FBI says that it received “prompts provided to GrokAI that generated approximately 200 pornographic videos of a woman who closely resembled VICTIM’s wife’s physical appearance.”*
That’s an interesting distinction. Is that still a crime if you’re not actually making nudes with a victims actual face? Obviously on top of everything else batshit crazy he did it’s just more evidence of his obsession. Or perhaps closely resembled is the legal way to say deepfakes.
I’ve been using grok strictly to straighten Patels eyes and give him big milkers. Am I fucked?
Correct me if in wrong, but I thought Grok wouldn’t make porn?
How long til they discover it’s GOP users and decide non consensual porn is okay.
Surprise they all came from Trump computer
xAI is a shit company.
Make boobies bigger, no bigger
Im sure its safe in the FBIs hands lol
Writing some text is non-consensual now?
It does nothing but generate stuff from Grok’s training data. If it’s trained on rape, that’s Musk you gotta get your hands on.