KI-Minister „enttäuscht“ von OpenAI-Treffen nach der Schießerei in Tumbler Ridge – ChatGPT-Entwickler hat das Konto des Schützen in British Columbia Monate vor den Morden gesperrt, die Polizei jedoch nicht über den Inhalt informiert
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/open-ai-government-meeting-tumbler-ridge-9.7104789
14 Kommentare
We have an AI minister?
Jesus, scapegoat much?
That’s a weak scapegoating to the actual issue
He’s going to be upset if he is forced to bring forward any sort of regulation on AI. He does not want to do that.
Human nature on display here. Nobody want’s [pre-crime](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-crime) until they don’t get pre-crime when it’s available.
Easier to blame AI than doctors pumping them full of hormones and mood-altering substances
I love the ridiculous assumption that the cops or prosecutors would have done anything about it.
This person had been visited by police multiple times for violence and threats, and nothing was done. But the government wants to pretend that an AI chat history would’ve landed him in jail?
That’s so stupid I can’t even process it. If openAI had sent the chat history to the cold they would have done precisely nothing, and everyone knows it.
‚AI minister‘ disappointed…
FTFY.
How about the rcmp also being the ones at fault? How many times were they neglecting this person obviously having serious mental issues and needing professional help
ChatGPT as it exists has a problem with driving mentally ill people over the edge. The way that it tells people they’re justified in their thoughts regardless of what they are is going to be disastrous for triggering psychosis and reinforcing paranoid beliefs.
Did he expect anything different?
I dispise most AI, but I value people having their privacy. They shouldn’t be able to see what someone asks a chat bot let alone have that information stored to share/look at later.
OpenAI doesn’t even have an office in Canada. US Remote positions pay 1 million a year. The same tech job in a Canadian company pays maybe 100k CAD.
Kind of understand, absent a credible threat, given the liberals history regarding online harms, this will just turn into a tipline for views the government deems „unacceptable “