Anthropic wird nicht nachgeben, während das Pentagon den KI-Streit eskaliert
Anthropic wird nicht nachgeben, während das Pentagon den KI-Streit eskaliert
23 Kommentare
Good for them. The „Department of War“ can pound sand.
Department Of Wah
Good! Even if they threatened me with death I’d tell the US government to fuck off after I delete and destroy every single bit of work I’ve created so they can’t even steal it.
I don’t even understand why the Alcoholic in charge of the DOD wants it to be changed. Like it wouldn’t even matter realistically as the current doctrine requires a human in the loop.
The „trigger“ still must be pulled by a human even after removing all safety features from tbe AI. Pete ofc doesn’t know this as he is probably to drunk
What did they think would happen?
„Dat naym dern’t sownd ‚merukun tuh me.“ — maggites, all of them.
This whole situation reminds me of the ending for the X-Files episode „Ghost in the Machine“ when the agent is trying trying to recover the AI after the creator destroyed it. I know the story had nothing directly to do with the govt using it during the episode but feels familiar.
Yeah, Google tried that years ago and they have completely walked away from that position.
Can I just say I love the new names for things in the US Government. „Department of War“ — „Board of Peace.“ — They’re like things 6 year olds draw on buildings in their comics to note what they are
Yeah, fight the wanna be dictatorship!
> Pentagon officials have argued the military’s use of technology should be governed by U.S. law and constitutional limits, **not by the usage policies of private contractors.**
We will take your product and force you to make it do what we want. The American government controls you and your business. But not in like a socialist way. Only in like a kidnappy way.
Get fucked fake war department.
I think it’s more than this: they can’t.
„releasing“ the restrictions would mean retraining the entire model which would be expensive and time consuming.
Nor should they. They’d almost certainly win if it went to court.
Not smart to try and strong-arm something you are declaring a necessity and potential supply chain risk. Either way, it’s not like two criminal organizations can settle disputes in a court of law.
Why don’t we invest in AI competency instead of AI owners?
About time one of them takes a stand. The rest need to follow suit.
Can’t they move the company to Europe?
The American government cannot have a citizen with principles. This shall not stand.
Can someone catch me up, why does the government even care about anthropics ai safety stance?
More people need to know what Hegseth is demanding and how evil and dangerous it is.
I may not be a fan of everything this guy (Anthropic CEO) says, but at least this looks to be a good thing.
I’m so disillusioned these days that it wouldn’t surprise me to find out he’s simultaneously and secretly funding lobbyists for AI deregulation. Rich people follow weird rules.
I appreciate so much that one of the AI companies has morals and integrity. I will find out how to give them business.
[removed]