Makes sense. If you’re competitive enough to reach the Olympics, money is just a side incentive to competition
IkeRoberts on
Norway? They were of the chart.
Lexiplehx on
Unsolicited Critique:
* Plotting two things on a shared axis that aren’t obviously related is a surefire way to end up with confused plots
* It leads to things like having Singapore (and a lot of other countries) at the very top despite zero medals
* Norway is nowhere in the chart despite having the highest medal count
* Adding a legend for „bronze, silver, gold“ is redundant
* The block of text explaining the data source should not go right next to the title
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
4 Kommentare
Data source: USA Today survey (https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/olympics/2026/02/10/how-much-athletes-earn-for-winning-winter-olympics-medal-usa/87593031007/ and https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/olympics/2026/02/16/2026-winter-olympics-medalists-money-medal-winners-count/88707405007/); Olympics.com (https://www.olympics.com/en/milano-cortina-2026/medals)
Created in Illustrator.
Makes sense. If you’re competitive enough to reach the Olympics, money is just a side incentive to competition
Norway? They were of the chart.
Unsolicited Critique:
* Plotting two things on a shared axis that aren’t obviously related is a surefire way to end up with confused plots
* It leads to things like having Singapore (and a lot of other countries) at the very top despite zero medals
* Norway is nowhere in the chart despite having the highest medal count
* Adding a legend for „bronze, silver, gold“ is redundant
* The block of text explaining the data source should not go right next to the title