What happened in 1957? Its the lowest number of orbital launches on the graph.
Former-Tonight-7320 on
Thank you SpaceX!!
A monumental shift in space flights. Epic.
Kingstad on
carpet the planet for all future in trash
CurtisLeow on
By annual launch rate, the Falcon 9 is the most successful orbital rocket ever developed. The Falcon 9 has a higher launch rate than the Soyuz in the 1980’s. Reuse in the Falcon 9 works. All future orbital rockets should be modeled in part on the Falcon 9. It is simply a better design.
Astro_Avatar on
orbital rocket launch attempts, rather?
bigolchimneypipe on
Doesn’t look like NASA’s financial cuts has affected the US’s space exploration.
countafit on
Is RocketLab also boosting those numbers?
Decronym on
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:
|Fewer Letters|More Letters|
|——-|———|—|
|[ESA](/r/Space/comments/1rbmj7u/stub/o6t0pxs „Last usage“)|European Space Agency|
|[ICBM](/r/Space/comments/1rbmj7u/stub/o6u8a2f „Last usage“)|Intercontinental Ballistic Missile|
|[LEO](/r/Space/comments/1rbmj7u/stub/o6tz6vn „Last usage“)|Low Earth Orbit (180-2000km)|
| |Law Enforcement Officer (most often mentioned during transport operations)|
|[NG](/r/Space/comments/1rbmj7u/stub/o6u8gme „Last usage“)|New Glenn, two/three-stage orbital vehicle by Blue Origin|
| |Natural Gas (as opposed to pure methane)|
| |Northrop Grumman, aerospace manufacturer|
|[SLS](/r/Space/comments/1rbmj7u/stub/o6u8a2f „Last usage“)|Space Launch System heavy-lift|
|[ULA](/r/Space/comments/1rbmj7u/stub/o6t0pxs „Last usage“)|United Launch Alliance (Lockheed/Boeing joint venture)|
|Jargon|Definition|
|——-|———|—|
|[Raptor](/r/Space/comments/1rbmj7u/stub/o6u8gme „Last usage“)|[Methane-fueled rocket engine](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raptor_(rocket_engine_family)) under development by SpaceX|
|[Starlink](/r/Space/comments/1rbmj7u/stub/o6uebhw „Last usage“)|SpaceX’s world-wide satellite broadband constellation|
|[methalox](/r/Space/comments/1rbmj7u/stub/o6tq8gl „Last usage“)|Portmanteau: methane fuel, liquid oxygen oxidizer|
Decronym is now also available on Lemmy! Requests for support and new installations should be directed to the Contact address below.
I wish all these datasets would include a secondary dataset that excludes starlink launches. Nothing against them, i just want to see if general orbital interest is going up or if its entirely just starlink (and a tiny bit of Amazon’s version)
Long_comment_san on
Oh so space X is „US“? I thought it was private
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
11 Kommentare
[deleted]
What happened in 1957? Its the lowest number of orbital launches on the graph.
Thank you SpaceX!!
A monumental shift in space flights. Epic.
carpet the planet for all future in trash
By annual launch rate, the Falcon 9 is the most successful orbital rocket ever developed. The Falcon 9 has a higher launch rate than the Soyuz in the 1980’s. Reuse in the Falcon 9 works. All future orbital rockets should be modeled in part on the Falcon 9. It is simply a better design.
orbital rocket launch attempts, rather?
Doesn’t look like NASA’s financial cuts has affected the US’s space exploration.
Is RocketLab also boosting those numbers?
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:
|Fewer Letters|More Letters|
|——-|———|—|
|[ESA](/r/Space/comments/1rbmj7u/stub/o6t0pxs „Last usage“)|European Space Agency|
|[ICBM](/r/Space/comments/1rbmj7u/stub/o6u8a2f „Last usage“)|Intercontinental Ballistic Missile|
|[LEO](/r/Space/comments/1rbmj7u/stub/o6tz6vn „Last usage“)|Low Earth Orbit (180-2000km)|
| |Law Enforcement Officer (most often mentioned during transport operations)|
|[NG](/r/Space/comments/1rbmj7u/stub/o6u8gme „Last usage“)|New Glenn, two/three-stage orbital vehicle by Blue Origin|
| |Natural Gas (as opposed to pure methane)|
| |Northrop Grumman, aerospace manufacturer|
|[SLS](/r/Space/comments/1rbmj7u/stub/o6u8a2f „Last usage“)|Space Launch System heavy-lift|
|[ULA](/r/Space/comments/1rbmj7u/stub/o6t0pxs „Last usage“)|United Launch Alliance (Lockheed/Boeing joint venture)|
|Jargon|Definition|
|——-|———|—|
|[Raptor](/r/Space/comments/1rbmj7u/stub/o6u8gme „Last usage“)|[Methane-fueled rocket engine](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raptor_(rocket_engine_family)) under development by SpaceX|
|[Starlink](/r/Space/comments/1rbmj7u/stub/o6uebhw „Last usage“)|SpaceX’s world-wide satellite broadband constellation|
|[methalox](/r/Space/comments/1rbmj7u/stub/o6tq8gl „Last usage“)|Portmanteau: methane fuel, liquid oxygen oxidizer|
Decronym is now also available on Lemmy! Requests for support and new installations should be directed to the Contact address below.
—————-
^(9 acronyms in this thread; )[^(the most compressed thread commented on today)](/r/Space/comments/1raunrr)^( has 18 acronyms.)
^([Thread #12185 for this sub, first seen 22nd Feb 2026, 17:22])
^[[FAQ]](http://decronym.xyz/) [^([Full list])](http://decronym.xyz/acronyms/Space) [^[Contact]](https://hachyderm.io/@Two9A) [^([Source code])](https://gistdotgithubdotcom/Two9A/1d976f9b7441694162c8)
I wish all these datasets would include a secondary dataset that excludes starlink launches. Nothing against them, i just want to see if general orbital interest is going up or if its entirely just starlink (and a tiny bit of Amazon’s version)
Oh so space X is „US“? I thought it was private