[Scott Manley] Erklären, warum der Starliner-Bericht der NASA so schlecht ist

I know these are complex systems (which is why subsystems are tested to death) but it looks like this might be a case of the program carrying too much management baggage to be cost efficient. When that happens, corners get cut, testing is reduced, and more risk is accepted.

It doesn’t help that legacy programs lead to „we’ve always done it that way“ thinking and new ideas are killed off before given proper consideration. Had Boeing started with a truly clean slate, perhaps the outcome would be different.