Share.

    41 Kommentare

    1. It gives me great joy that Canada 🇨🇦 had its invitation rescinded by the toddler in chief.

    2. What an interesting shorthand to illustrate Trumps eroding of the United States’s soft power influence. Not sure if any enemy could have done as much damage to our nation and its standing as this putrid human monster.

    3. heytherehellogoodbye on

      On the board of peace: a bunch of countries that want Israel erased from the map. How very „peaceful“ their motives surely are /s

    4. Wet_Philtrum_76 on

      i think the countries accepted are some of the least peaceful countries ever

    5. CucumberWisdom on

      Shouldn’t light blue be „invitation issued but not yet accepted or declined“?

    6. I bet when he was grifting New Yorkers in his real-life game of Monopoly years ago he never expected that one day he would do the same on a global scale, making a mockery of geopolitical norms in the process. What have we done?

    7. Sorta reminds me of G. W. Bush’s “coalition of the willing” which was mainly a bunch of banana republics that was never going to help us militarily.

    8. Rare_Magazine_5362 on

      I feel like I would’ve been really good at this game in advance of looking at this list.

    9. JasnahRadiance on

      Under the „Board of Peace“ rules, the chairman (Trump) holds the seat for life and has a veto over all decisions. Total buffoonery. What a scam

    10. democracy_lover66 on

      Invitation rescinded 🤟🤟🤟🤟🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦

    11. If only there were an existing international organization with 193 member states where this sort of thing could get worked out.

    12. Aggressive_Scar5243 on

      That figures. Who the fuck takes this ‚chairman of the board forever‘ cunt seriously anyway

    13. Rare_Magazine_5362 on

      I was sent this same list today in a kind of Ground News style aggregator that gives view points of articles from different political perspectives and I thought it had interesting takes on this. Just sharing.

      Edit: it’s certainly AI, all those types of news aggregators are so if you don’t want to see it because of that then fair warning.

      .

      1) Pro-Trump / Populist-Right

      This is a results-driven alternative to a failed UN system: a US-led coalition using financial commitment as proof of seriousness. Critics are clinging to process while this model forces action and accountability.

      2) Center-Left / Anti-Trump

      This is a pay-to-play power structure that monetizes influence and sidelines democratic norms. The fact that many traditional allies declined signals a credibility and legitimacy problem.

      3) European Establishment

      This undermines multilateral institutions and sets a dangerous precedent for bypassing the UN framework. Participation risks normalizing a parallel order built on transactional power rather than rules.

      4) Realist / Power Politics

      This is simply a new bargaining arena where states calculate costs and benefits relative to Washington. Acceptance or refusal reflects leverage, domestic politics, and strategic positioning — not ideology.

      5) Critical / Anti-Colonial & Human Rights

      This resembles reconstruction governed by donors rather than by the affected population. Wealth and geopolitical alignment appear to outweigh representation and self-determination.

    14. LateralEntry on

      Albania and Egypt committed troops to Gaza, that’s probably better than accepting the invitation

    15. Decathlon5891 on

      I remember in elementary my teacher would list all the good boys and the naughty ones on the black board

      It seems so identical to this  

      I’m Canadian so fuck it 🤷🏻‍♂️

    16. Dangerous-Flower-840 on

      The countries on the list that accepted vs the rest is so unsettling.

    17. Shouldn’t it be spelled ‚Bored‘? Pretty sure most of those countries aren’t really interested in peace as much as they are power.

    18. Affectionate_Code_91 on

      This „Board“ is nothing but a scam pay-to-play scheme by Trump.

    Leave A Reply