Trump unterstützt den selbsternannten „Nazi-mäßigen“ texanischen Republikaner, während Peter Thiel seine Kandidatur für den Kongress unterstützt

Thiel likes to make his blood bags famous.

Won’t be long before they start wearing party uniforms and armbands.

Just a normal day for MAGA.

If MaGA knew who Theil was, I find it unlikely they would be fans.

I hate Texas nazis.

All Republicans are fascist domestic terrorists.

The *sole* value of conservatism is respect for and obedience to [one’s perception of] traditionally established hierarchy, and hierarchy dictates that those on top (in-groups) are rightfully idolized and receive privileges, credibility, and resources, while those on the bottom (out-groups) are demonized/dehumanized and/or bound by restrictions, scrutiny, and lack of resources.

To them, the second-greatest injustice imaginable is for those [they perceive to be] on top [of social hierarchy] to be bound by the restrictions, scrutiny, and lack of resources reserved for those on the bottom. The first greatest injustice is for those on the bottom to have access to the rights, credibility, and resources reserved for those on top.

[Conservatism](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conservatism) — by definition — is „a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability, **stressing the importance of established hierarchies and institutions** (such as religion, the family, **and class structure**), and preferring gradual development to abrupt change“.

Likewise, from [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/conservatism/):

>Rational conservatives maintain that a community with a **hierarchy of authority is most conducive to human well-being**.

>Confucius is another possible precursor. His concern with the breakdown of contemporary political institutions led to a cautious, conservative political outlook; **his stress on authority and hierarchy prefigures central conservative themes**.

>With the Enlightenment, the natural order or **social hierarchy, previously largely accepted, was questioned**.

Western conservatism is a product from the Age of Enlightenment — specifically, a [Counter-Enlightenment](https://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/i7705.pdf), [a reactionary challenge to the concepts of Humanism](https://engelsbergideas.com/essays/counter-enlightenment/). Its philosophers inherently *reject[ed]* a society governed by logic and reason, human rights and dignity, science and democracy, as its ideology *solely appeal* to the authority of traditionally established hierarchies.

From the [Intellectual Roots of Conservatism: The Burkean Foundations](https://www.britannica.com/topic/conservatism/Intellectual-roots-of-conservatism), the man who is considered to be the founder of modern day Western conservatism had such to say about his ideology:

>Burke shocked his contemporaries by insisting with brutal frankness that **“illusions” and “prejudices” are socially necessary**. He believed that most **human beings are innately depraved, steeped in original sin, and unable to better themselves with their feeble reason**. Better, he said, to rely on the “latent wisdom” of prejudice, which accumulates slowly through the years, than to “put men to live and trade each on his own private stock of reason.” **Among such prejudices are those that favour an established church and a landed aristocracy**; members of the latter, according to Burke, are the “great oaks” and “proper chieftains” of society, provided that they temper their rule with a spirit of timely reform and remain within the constitutional framework.

*The very foundation of conservatism* demands, promotes, and advances a stratified society where *some people are „more/less“ people than others* via *stressing the importance of established hierarchies and institutions (such as class structure)* via *illusions* (lies) and *prejudices* (bigotries).

When conservatives feel that society has *progressed too far* — in other words, those traditionally on the lower echelons of [social] hierarchy being accepted and given rights, credibility, and resources reserved for those above their station; and/or those traditionally on the upper echelons being questioned and bound by the restrictions, scrutiny, and lack of resources reserved for those below their station — they will relinquish the „preferring gradual development to abrupt change“ and „social stability“ parts, and hearken and appeal to traditional hierarchical institutions, especially those that promote „might makes right“, as violence is a tool meant for those on top of social hierarchy to use upon those on the bottom to ensure the latter’s submission and obedience. Nationalism and racism are the go-to institutions for such, though sex[ual preference/identity] — those who don’t conform to traditional gender roles/norms/appearances/attitudes — is also popular; they will demand strict stratification of society and social hierarchy where in-groups and out-groups are clearly defined, where some people are „less people“ than others. The former — by nature — will shrink as less and less people will be found to be „pure“, and virtually everyone is considered „less people“ (with significantly fewer rights, credibility, and resources) when compared to the leader at the apex. This is known as [fascism](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism), which is the end result of conservatism.

„Know your place“ is their mantra.

Nazi-ish? There is no such thing. You’re either a Nazi or you aren’t one. One pinky toe in the water of being a Nazi means you are 100% a full throated Nazi. The tiniest amount of support or believe in something Nazi makes you as Nazi as the baldest, skinheadiest maniac.

These cowards hide their racism and supreme belief in their white skin under political suite. No need for white hoods anymore

Is the Texan candidate who wants to deport Native Americans? Oh wait no, that’s another guy just a tiny bit to the West.

Jesus Christ, Dallas/Ft Worth. I thought you were one of the more together parts of the state.

And what’s new? Trump said there were fine people on both sides of the terror attack on Charlottesville. Yep, some fine Nazis all right

This is one of the newly-drawn red districts „[that now extends from Dallas to East Texas](https://www.axios.com/local/dallas/2026/02/12/texas-congress-district-32-primary).“

Texas bumpkin from the least economically productive part of the state is gonna tell educated folk what to do? Go ahead america

Not surprised that his whole page is about helping Trump and further his agenda without acknowledging any real concerns of his constituents. Cult don’t care though.

The nazis are really going for it! Good for them! Love that they’re outing themselves, very cool

The tech bro billionaire elite are pulling Republican strings like puppets.

Thiel is one of those fucks that think the he is so rich that the poor should just be eliminated. But where will all that stop? Because everyone below his wealth is poor to him.

But don’t call them nazis