Share.

    5 Kommentare

    1. Thought they had given up on that, guess not. Tf is the world we live in…

    2. Fluid-Scar-3015 on

      Well, that’s nothing strange. A big tech company creating a product (even for a few decades) to charge money for, when everyone is forced to use it after a time (and b/c of no free/open alternative) is nothing unexpected. What worries me, is that seem to be no alternative at the moment already. What frightens me, is a vision of governments forbiding use of alternatives and calling people who would use alternatives, enemies of the state or worse. Not real? Well there were projects to ban use of VPNs in the EU for example… Scarry shit man…

    3. azurewindowpane on

      Only when uploading your app to Google Play. If you’re making your app available on F-Droid or otherwise, not necessary.

      Blocking full, „unverified“ sideloading would have been my line in the sand for Android being an „open platform“, but they didn’t do it.

      Misleading post; recommend it be removed.

    4. This feels more like a Play policy change than Android suddenly “not being open.” If it only applies to apps distributed through Google Play, that’s a store requirement, not the OS itself being locked down.

      Android still allows alternative stores and sideloading, which is kind of the core of its openness

    5. every-day_throw-away on

      Blame the rampant malware current devs serve up to unsuspected users.

      I support this. I don’t need the person I download software to be anonymous. 

    Leave A Reply