„This is outrageous, to assume that we are some tree-hugging hippies! Wrench worked just fine!“
bjarkov on
Huh. I guess it’s true then.
Used_Heron1705 on
For pro-Russia apologists, no amount of evidence would convince them. They are so keen on being seen as „anti-imperialist“ that they are willing to excuse murder.
phil-mitchell1 on
Strongly. Needed to quantify the scale of the rejection. Guilty conscience.
clamorous_owle on
So did the Kremlin use a toxin from a *different* species of frog? 🐸
ZielonaKrowa on
I don’t understand why this has resurfaced now. I thought it was established that he was murdered? Does it really matter if they used novichok, a toad venom or old fashion rope?
Neobullseye1 on
„We’ll have you know, we don’t need such primitive toxins as one gained from a frog. We can make much more efficient poisons in a laboratory, both ones that are nigh-instantaneous and ones that work agonizingly slow to make that filthy traitor suffer lik- I mean uhm… We didn’t do it?“ — Russia, probably.
Ch35hir3C47 on
It would be quite the change from Polonium(?) or Defenestration. Bullets are so lacking in artistry and car accidents are just so yesterday.
Low-Sir-8366 on
It’s already been proven 100 times, especially when Navalny himself called his killers with journalists, there’s video and evidence from the Germans. There’s really nothing to argue about
PKnecron on
Damn, it. They couldn’t find a window. /s
trisul-108 on
Yeah, sure, just as they strongly rejected the claims that they were going to invade Ukraine. Their assurances mean nothing.
Black_Otter on
“That would be extremely out of character for us” – Russia
>Note that the exotic nature of this **poison**, as with the polonium and novichuk used in previous high-profile Kremlin assassinations, is a message: Do not doubt who did it. It is a confession, a boast. Putin’s is a murderous regime confident in its **impunity**.
hexhex on
Nobody cares what kremlin has to say. Lying is their second nature at this point. If anything, whatever they say is a strong indicator that the opposite is true.
canspop on
So, the kremlin speaks, the kremlin lies.
We know it’s true, because they’ve denied it.
Grand_Sock_1303 on
The kremlin strongly rejects reality
ShakeMyHeadSadly on
OK. So what did you poison him with?
nithrean on
Do not believe anything until the Kremlin denies it.
oripash on
Exactly what the Kremlin would say.
KSaburof on
It’s like every other „strong rejects“ by kremlin of all crimes they are commiting OPENLY and literally DAILY 🤷♂️ „Don’t believe anything until the Kremlin denies it“ is not a joke for a long time
PaintressLeia on
Don’t believe it until the Kremlin denies it.
User-no-relation on
Wink.gif
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
25 Kommentare
It was a toad and not a frog !
Thanks for the conformation.
„This is outrageous, to assume that we are some tree-hugging hippies! Wrench worked just fine!“
Huh. I guess it’s true then.
For pro-Russia apologists, no amount of evidence would convince them. They are so keen on being seen as „anti-imperialist“ that they are willing to excuse murder.
Strongly. Needed to quantify the scale of the rejection. Guilty conscience.
So did the Kremlin use a toxin from a *different* species of frog? 🐸
I don’t understand why this has resurfaced now. I thought it was established that he was murdered? Does it really matter if they used novichok, a toad venom or old fashion rope?
„We’ll have you know, we don’t need such primitive toxins as one gained from a frog. We can make much more efficient poisons in a laboratory, both ones that are nigh-instantaneous and ones that work agonizingly slow to make that filthy traitor suffer lik- I mean uhm… We didn’t do it?“ — Russia, probably.
It would be quite the change from Polonium(?) or Defenestration. Bullets are so lacking in artistry and car accidents are just so yesterday.
It’s already been proven 100 times, especially when Navalny himself called his killers with journalists, there’s video and evidence from the Germans. There’s really nothing to argue about
Damn, it. They couldn’t find a window. /s
Yeah, sure, just as they strongly rejected the claims that they were going to invade Ukraine. Their assurances mean nothing.
“That would be extremely out of character for us” – Russia
I thought it was Novichok nerve
Just gonna post what Gary Kasparov said on [twitter](https://x.com/Kasparov63/status/2022791096523219438):
>Note that the exotic nature of this **poison**, as with the polonium and novichuk used in previous high-profile Kremlin assassinations, is a message: Do not doubt who did it. It is a confession, a boast. Putin’s is a murderous regime confident in its **impunity**.
Nobody cares what kremlin has to say. Lying is their second nature at this point. If anything, whatever they say is a strong indicator that the opposite is true.
So, the kremlin speaks, the kremlin lies.
We know it’s true, because they’ve denied it.
The kremlin strongly rejects reality
OK. So what did you poison him with?
Do not believe anything until the Kremlin denies it.
Exactly what the Kremlin would say.
It’s like every other „strong rejects“ by kremlin of all crimes they are commiting OPENLY and literally DAILY 🤷♂️ „Don’t believe anything until the Kremlin denies it“ is not a joke for a long time
Don’t believe it until the Kremlin denies it.
Wink.gif