>Five years ago, Facebook shut down the facial recognition system for tagging people in photos on its social network, saying it wanted to find “the right balance” for a technology that raises privacy and legal concerns. Now it wants to bring facial recognition back.
>Meta’s internal memo said the political tumult in the United States was good timing for the feature’s release.
>“*We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns*,” according to the document from Meta’s Reality Labs, which works on hardware including smart glasses.
Otherwise_Dramatic on
Meta just doesn’t care anymore
CthulhusSoreTentacle on
This shit needs to be legislated to oblivion.
eternalityLP on
Nice, they can start reducing your social credit if you talk to unapproved people.
ux3l on
These glasses need to be banned (at least outside of the US) ASAP.
FoundationGreat7072 on
New age, don`t trust anyone with glasses, clap clap, thats not the way to define future.
new_random_username on
I hope that feature (or even the glasses) get outlawed in Europe.
TronOld_Dumps on
So being in public is being auto filmed now. More than it was…..
SchrodingersNutsack on
How do I opt out of a service from a company I don’t even use?
heavy-minium on
Lol these glasses don’t even do enough that I wouldn’t even use them for free, and yet they want to do this?! How is this company not bankrupt yet? And remember how it flopped so much after blowing that massive marketing budget?
pomcomic on
Just wait for a government agency to tap into these like they did with Nest cameras. This is an absolute nightmare and needs to be banned yesterday.
onyxlabyrinth1979 on
This is one of those developments that sounds small on paper but has big downstream implications. Facial recognition in something like smart glasses isn’t just a feature upgrade, it changes the social contract. With fixed cameras such as in CCTV and phones, there’s at least some visibility that recording might be happening. With wearable glasses, identification becomes ambient and invisible. The obvious concerns are privacy and consent. Most people didn’t agree to have their face scanned in public spaces and matched against databases in real time. Even if Meta limits it to opt-in databases at first, history shows features tend to expand once normalized. There’s also the error problem. Facial recognition systems have improved, but they’re not perfect. False positives in a handheld app are one thing. False identification in everyday social situations is another, especially if people start acting on that information. And then there’s the normalization factor. Once enough people wear these, opting out becomes impossible. You can choose not to use them, but you can’t choose not to be seen by them. From a technical standpoint, it’s predictable. From a societal standpoint, it’s another step toward frictionless identification in public spaces. Whether that increases safety, convenience, or just surveillance depends heavily on regulation, and historically, regulation tends to trail capability. It’s not dystopia tomorrow. But it is a meaningful shift in what public anonymity means.
magwai9 on
Wish these people would just fuck off to Mars
Tinelytolmit on
The facial rec is going to get it wrong one day and lead to some random guy arrested
somethingohyeah on
Can someone explain to me why is this needed ??? I already understand the public surveilance bit, but how does this benefit the person wearing these glasses?
Cynical_Classicist on
Surveillance state then?
TheHistorian2 on
Stalker glasses.
Rude-Dependent-4353 on
Because of course they do. After all, they’re Meta, they have a reputation to uphold.
Waterprop on
Great, more devices that companies and intelligence agencies can spy us with.
Anyway, I don’t think Smart Glasses will take off like smartphones and smartwatches did.
Tunggall on
These ought to be banned in my country. No ifs or buts.
HamsterAdorable2666 on
So all we have to do is stop using their shit.
It would be hard but if we can encourage people to make it a trend to detox all together on the same day maybe the impact will encourage people to extend the days or make it easier to boycott these fascist companies altogether.
SkyYandere on
If t hose anti-paparazzi glasses actually work, they’re going to see a large uptick in sales soon…
cognitivebetterment on
wont be allowed in EU, clear GDPR breach
ActionHartlen on
And we plan to ban this product entirely
All-the-pizza on
I don’t even care anymore.
foghillgal on
So Glasshole V2 I guess.
So, making a fracking database of everyone you meet. Meta should pay people for those glasses since they`re basically Google Street view cars for people.
Remember when Google blurred peoples face… Well, in this case they fracking take in people`s face!! I’m pretty sure the EU will be all fine and dandy with all that.
dimwalker on
Earlier kids wearing glasses were bullied for being „4-eyed freaks“ now they will be bullied for being „spies“.
No rest for the myopic.
totallyRebb on
Zuck loves Thiel
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
28 Kommentare
[Archive Link](https://archive.md/xAtyG#selection-493.0-493.68) to avoid the paywall.
>Five years ago, Facebook shut down the facial recognition system for tagging people in photos on its social network, saying it wanted to find “the right balance” for a technology that raises privacy and legal concerns. Now it wants to bring facial recognition back.
>Meta’s internal memo said the political tumult in the United States was good timing for the feature’s release.
>“*We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns*,” according to the document from Meta’s Reality Labs, which works on hardware including smart glasses.
Meta just doesn’t care anymore
This shit needs to be legislated to oblivion.
Nice, they can start reducing your social credit if you talk to unapproved people.
These glasses need to be banned (at least outside of the US) ASAP.
New age, don`t trust anyone with glasses, clap clap, thats not the way to define future.
I hope that feature (or even the glasses) get outlawed in Europe.
So being in public is being auto filmed now. More than it was…..
How do I opt out of a service from a company I don’t even use?
Lol these glasses don’t even do enough that I wouldn’t even use them for free, and yet they want to do this?! How is this company not bankrupt yet? And remember how it flopped so much after blowing that massive marketing budget?
Just wait for a government agency to tap into these like they did with Nest cameras. This is an absolute nightmare and needs to be banned yesterday.
This is one of those developments that sounds small on paper but has big downstream implications. Facial recognition in something like smart glasses isn’t just a feature upgrade, it changes the social contract. With fixed cameras such as in CCTV and phones, there’s at least some visibility that recording might be happening. With wearable glasses, identification becomes ambient and invisible. The obvious concerns are privacy and consent. Most people didn’t agree to have their face scanned in public spaces and matched against databases in real time. Even if Meta limits it to opt-in databases at first, history shows features tend to expand once normalized. There’s also the error problem. Facial recognition systems have improved, but they’re not perfect. False positives in a handheld app are one thing. False identification in everyday social situations is another, especially if people start acting on that information. And then there’s the normalization factor. Once enough people wear these, opting out becomes impossible. You can choose not to use them, but you can’t choose not to be seen by them. From a technical standpoint, it’s predictable. From a societal standpoint, it’s another step toward frictionless identification in public spaces. Whether that increases safety, convenience, or just surveillance depends heavily on regulation, and historically, regulation tends to trail capability. It’s not dystopia tomorrow. But it is a meaningful shift in what public anonymity means.
Wish these people would just fuck off to Mars
The facial rec is going to get it wrong one day and lead to some random guy arrested
Can someone explain to me why is this needed ??? I already understand the public surveilance bit, but how does this benefit the person wearing these glasses?
Surveillance state then?
Stalker glasses.
Because of course they do. After all, they’re Meta, they have a reputation to uphold.
Great, more devices that companies and intelligence agencies can spy us with.
Anyway, I don’t think Smart Glasses will take off like smartphones and smartwatches did.
These ought to be banned in my country. No ifs or buts.
So all we have to do is stop using their shit.
It would be hard but if we can encourage people to make it a trend to detox all together on the same day maybe the impact will encourage people to extend the days or make it easier to boycott these fascist companies altogether.
If t hose anti-paparazzi glasses actually work, they’re going to see a large uptick in sales soon…
wont be allowed in EU, clear GDPR breach
And we plan to ban this product entirely
I don’t even care anymore.
So Glasshole V2 I guess.
So, making a fracking database of everyone you meet. Meta should pay people for those glasses since they`re basically Google Street view cars for people.
Remember when Google blurred peoples face… Well, in this case they fracking take in people`s face!! I’m pretty sure the EU will be all fine and dandy with all that.
Earlier kids wearing glasses were bullied for being „4-eyed freaks“ now they will be bullied for being „spies“.
No rest for the myopic.
Zuck loves Thiel