Share.

    4 Kommentare

    1. Sad_Kangaroo_5504 on

      If they are saying half, then I suppose it’s safe to say they destroyed ~25% of deployed Pantsir systems.

    2. If that’s true, that’s actually insane. 50% reductions means massive holes in anti air coverage. That long range strike campaign may be picking up steam in the future.

    3. Independent-Reader on

      Before 1991, Ukraine did not have its own separate military. It was the Ukrainian SSR, one of the 15 republics of the Soviet Union.

      Ukrainians consistently made up a large share of the Soviet military.

      The Ukrainian SSR was the second‑largest republic in the USSR after Russia, both in population and industrial capacity.

      This meant a large portion of conscripts came from Ukraine.

      Many high‑ranking Soviet officers were Ukrainian by origin.

      Ukraine may be a much smaller country than Russia geographically speaking, but it wasn’t just a manpower source — it was one of the USSR’s most militarized republics. Ukrainians often made up 20–25% of the Soviet Armed Forces. In some periods (especially WWII), the share was even higher. Ukraine produced a huge number of officers, including many generals and marshals.

      Ukraine was heavily militarized due to its western border position. Ukraine also historically hosted enormous Soviet military infrastructure.

      Ukraine is a very capable country with a rich history of defending local autonomy, resisting foreign rule, with irregular/volunteer formations to do so.

    Leave A Reply