WHO bezeichnet von den USA finanzierten Impfstoffversuch für Neugeborene als „unethisch“

How much did the USA stiff the WHO for when it left? $200 million?

Edit – Yes I know that this would be a problem regardless.

I think the USA is doing a disservice to the WHO and humanity in general. Its a big part of their budget. If I worked for the WHO, I wouldnt let them pull crap like this without saying anything.

Real life constant gardener

It’s Black newborns, so…

Trying to figure out if I can summarize this article from my understanding:

The study is being done by a controversial research organization based in a Copenhagen university – questionable ethics and methods in alleged vaccine safety concerns. RFK Jr. cited their research in the decision to cut global vaccine funding.

The CDC will fund their most recent study: 14k babies in Guinea-Bissau, Africa will be given the hepatitis B vaccine at either birth or six weeks, then the alleged difference in safety will be compared.

The reasons the WHO is against this are:

* This vaccine has been used in 115 countries for 3 decades and is already established as effective and safe
* Health officials everywhere are basically saying it’s both unethical and pointless
* G-B is already planning to move to the at birth dose for all in 2028, they just can’t do it right now becuase of resource constraints/not enough money. This study is basically exploiting that they don’t have the money to vaccinate babies earlier and instead of funding that they are doing this expirement
* 12% of adults in G-B have Hepititus B, so putting the babies in real danger
* The trial is being done in a less rigorous way than others that is more open to interpretation, potentially leading to a subconscious nudge to a certain result
* G-B has said they’re looking into it for ethicality and it shouldn’t happen. CDC says it’s totally happening (more ethical concerns)

Good. As long as someone is getting “slammed”.

I fucking hate clickbait journalism.