Wie kam das FBI an das Filmmaterial der Google Nest-Kamera von Nancy Guthrie, wenn diese deaktiviert war – und was bedeutet das für Ihre Privatsphäre?

    https://www.tomsguide.com/computing/online-security/how-did-the-fbi-get-nancy-guthries-google-nest-camera-footage-if-it-was-disabled-and-what-does-it-mean-for-your-privacy

    Share.

    25 Kommentare

    1. hello_everyone_555 on

      Privacy, ha ha.

      Anywhere you go, there are cameras these days recording without your permission. Malls, airports. There are systems that can identify you within seconds from these camera feeds.

      Forget privacy. Privacy is dead.

    2. HumongousBelly on

      You still believe in privacy? All of your tech gadgets are spying on you constantly.

      Even if you abstain from tech and move to the woods, satellites can easily film you anywhere on this planet if they choose to.

      The illusion of privacy is probably the greatest grift of the 21st century.

    3. If you’re willingly installing Google products, you have no privacy. Obviously.

    4. silverbolt2000 on

      This thread is already full of mouth-foaming rage from bots, and while the article is mainly an advertising channel for **best home security cameras** commissions it does confirm that wireless Nest doorbells will always upload around 3 hrs worth of video footage to Google’s servers whether you have a subscription or not.

      As always, treat all smart devices as „always on and always recording“ if you value privacy over convenience.

    5. IssueEmbarrassed8103 on

      My living room camera randomly turned green for 10 seconds the other day when I’ve had it “disabled” for months. Guess I have to unplug it to be sure

    6. Edward Snowden was trying to tell us that the NSA has access to every bit of data that is sent over major internet backbones. As long as this data is transferred from one device to another unencrypted, then they have a copy.

    7. Glittering-Youth-157 on

      I read that the tampering/disabling with the camera is why it was still available. Either that or they have more video and are keeping it confidential, and the device could have been recording all along. We don’t know

    8. ThepalehorseRiderr on

      They steal all kinds of data. All law enforcement does nowadays. They just can’t use it in court.

    9. It wasn’t disabled, she just hadn’t paid for the subscription that would have allowed her to save and view video locally.  That doesn’t mean it stops recording.

    10. It means stop letting corporations have access to important things like security cameras.

    11. Curious_Party_4683 on

      if any cam or device is connect to the net, you can assume privacy is gone.

      you can block any devices from getting online though. easy as seen here [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUYz8WH9zBg](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUYz8WH9zBg)

      that’s how i got my indoor cams offline. to view remotely, vpn back in.

    12. DribbleYourTribble on

      This is a digital rights question also. Why should video that I recorded and often captures me and my family not be digitally my property?

    13. It means if you get a camera that supports a cloud situation at all, you’ve got something with almost no privacy protection. Basically… whatever the company feels like doing is the standard we’re currently at.

    14. imaginary_num6er on

      > In this case, not only was the power cut to her home before the kidnapping but she also didn’t have a paid plan that would have uploaded any recorded clips to the cloud.

      News flash: Nest cameras come with their alternate power source

    15. c4upinhisbhole on

      Here’s my “mouth-foaming rage” contribution to this thread. If you have devices or are around devices that have cameras and/or mics that are connected to a network or can be connected to a network your privacy becomes severely compromised.

    16. Open_Potato_5686 on

      Edward Snowden is the real hero for truly unmasking the surveillance state!!

    17. Sifl-and-Olly on

      Another poster said that particular model stores a local copy of video, regardless if cloud is enabled. The feds grabbed the clip from the device’s local storage. Sounds reasonable if true.

    18. That’s a lot of words to tell us that even if the thing is off, it’s still on.

    19. MountainAsparagus4 on

      Lol there is no privacy, companies actively hear everything you say and watch everything you do on your phone pc and posts and now they have ai to watch it more efficiently to sell your data secretly, openly who cares nothing will be done to stop them all they gotta do is give the government some of it for free when they come knocking

    20. Earlycuyler1 on

      If you have nest/ ring/ eufi/ Alexa/ etc and you are concerned about privacy you’re an idiot.

    Leave A Reply