Close Menu
    Politics

    Bondi hatte während der Anhörung im Capitol Hill eine Liste der „Suchhistorie“ der Epstein-Akten eines demokratischen Abgeordneten

    Share.
    View 39 Comments

    39 Kommentare

    1. Relevant_Swing1680 on

      So weird, why are they even tracking this shit? It just goes to show how little privacy we all really have.

    2. CouchCorrespondent on

      Attorney General for the United States, ladies and gentleman.

      Confidentiality ain’t her strong suit….but ask about her „Regina George“ impressions!

    3. finnerpeace on

      Isn’t this surveillance of a lawmaker? And isn’t that normally illegal?

    4. ranchoparksteve on

      She seemed to have nothing worthwhile to talk about. I suppose her staff know she’s a completely empty vessel and created these binders.

    6. TintedApostle on

      So Bondi violated Congressional Secrecy with the Executive Branch spying on the Legislative Branch…. wait didn’t republicans complain about Biden doing this due to 1/6 connections?

    7. ToadP on

      If only she had a list of the Co-Conspirators with her, then she wouldn’t have perjured herself multiple times, also Why we protecting these People?

    8. Hyperica on

      The searches seem to be pretty reasonable. Why is this a gotcha? When I saw „I love the torture video,“ I wanted to know who in God’s name is involved in that shit. Why wouldn’t you search for the most egregious and memorable pieces of information to see which names were censored?

    9. KeepCalmCarryOnKY on

      This is total normal behavior of a transparent admin. „I’ll let you have access to the files and track your every movement“.

    12. iprobablybrokeit on

      Ted Lieu brought a whole perjury trap, turns out she didn’t need any help. She came fully prepared to get herself impeached several times over!

    13. Ok_Cartographer_1867 on

      Also Bondi’s list is from the unredacted files and she likely illegally exposed information which should have been concealed but instead showed it in an open public hearing (or very likely it wasn’t supposed to be redacted and illegally got redacted).

      The fact that she brought this liar to a public hearing may be illegal.
      For example in document EFTA2504630 the email sender name is redacted for the public, but in the Jayapal Pramila Search history list Bondi’s notes say it is from Kira Dikhtyar to Jeffrey Epstein. Kira Dikhtyar’s name should be redacted and shouldn’t be exposed by Bondi in a public hearing. Bondi bringing these notes either exposed a victim (Kira Dikhtyar) which is illegal or Kira Dikhtyar is not victim and was illegally redacted by the DOJ. Link to public searchable document https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02504630.pdf

    14. puffdragon on

      Is this supposed to be blackmail? Like outing peoples internet search history if they give you a hard time for exposing how you covered up your boss blackmailing his way to the presidency?

    16. Busy_Book_2811 on

      This is what they do not get: majority of the people will rather see their own father in prisons for these type of abuse than protect random democrat just because they are democrats. Blind loyalty seem only thing they do get. 

    17. StaticNegative on

      I nominate Pam Bondi for prison. Why wait for 2 years? Let’s get it started now. Get bent DOJ. We all know you are watching these threads. Because heter its now or in 2 years, you will look great in a bright orange prison jumpsuit

    18. Ok_Cucumber_7954 on

      And what are they going to do about it? Send another strongly worded letter?

    19. Sweet_Nothin on

      Bondi is the most unlikable and least relatable character in public life I’ve ever seen. Bondi is an embarrassment to the USA

    21. Orion14159 on

      Fun thought, has anyone asked Congress to search Pam’s name in the Epstein files?

    22. AF2005 on

      She has lots of conjecture and hearsay, those are “types” of evidence…

      We’re living in a real life Simpsons episode 🤦🏻

    24. lasers42 on

      They never thought they would ever be caught. Deep contempt for us little people, and deep hatred of women and girls.

      A casualty of the so-called information age where, despite the best efforts of the wealthy, the powerful, the intelligentsia, the truth is slowly coming out that they are playing by different rules, which only really apply to us.

      Not the first time in history that happened, but it usually results in warfare. Hopefully we can still vote our way out, and some receive justice.

      Despite the efforts of the Department of Justice, justice will prevail.

    26. Lambs2Lions_ on

      How do you guys recover from this peacefully? Even if they give up power, I doubt they will but even if they do. Every single one of them will just receive presidential pardons. Without criminals being brought to justice, you will never recover internally or externally. The trust in the office will be completely shattered,

    27. Particular_Peacock on

      The King has been spying on Parliament.

      Why would the King do such a thing?

    28. PDXftw on

      Her tongue is far up Trump’s disgusting fat ass, it’s beyond repulsive. Nuremberg trials for her and the rest of these f-cking traitors.

    29. sephtater on

      The fact that we all keep witnessing this, and absolutely nothing happens, is deeply troubling.

    30. PhilTheTool on

      Right, like that time they made pizza a vegetable. Government nails it again 😅

    32. metricspace- on

      I would really love professionals at the pinnicle of government.

      We deserve an uncommon lawyer amongst uncommon lawyers.
      How this absolutely unimpressive woman has become Attorney General of Florida for almost a decade and became AG of these United States, proves you can fail upward.

    33. QuarterFlounder on

      Espionage. All the more reason to put her in a prison cell where her and the rest of the Epstein class belong.

    36. SpiritualScumlord on

      So hold on, she’s claiming this is a Democrat’s list? EFTA1930501’s message is one of the most notorious and they redacted the sender’s email address. This looks like they put together a list of their own people and redacted their names and are trying to pass it off as Democrats.

    38. Upset-Somewhere3089 on

      If only they’d put this much effort into running a clean government.

    39. MRH8R on

      What do they mean by”getting Orwellian?” Shit’s been Orwellian for quite a while now.

    Leave A Reply