Die USA entscheiden, dass SpaceX einer Fluggesellschaft gleicht, und nehmen es vom Labor Relations Act aus. Die USA bezeichnen SpaceX als gemeinsamen Luftfrachtführer und werden das Unternehmen nach dem Eisenbahnrecht regulieren.

    https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/victory-for-elon-musk-us-labor-board-abandons-authority-over-spacex/

    Share.

    25 Kommentare

    1. Bishopjones2112 on

      Yeah self policing is a great idea. Remember this in months or years when stories start rolling out about how screwed everything is.

    2. This will add to an argument that SpaceX is too important and must be nationalized for space capability and security in the future.
      They are not like a normal company. Understood.

    3. KennyDROmega on

      So you see son, a space travel company is lot like, oh say, an airline…..

    4. And those Starlink satellites are people and they should have direct access to voting machines so they can vote! 😆

    5. Albion_Tourgee on

      The same legal flimflammery used by FedEx in the day to evade labor laws, by getting its package delivery drivers classified as common carrier employees.

    6. Mother_Tree_9767 on

      We’re watching all of these tech companies essentially merge with the US gov, the people better wake up in a hurry because the hour is later than we think

    7. Mother_Tree_9767 on

      We’re watching all of these tech companies essentially merge with the US gov, the people better wake up in a hurry because the hour is later than we think

    8. theflyinfoote on

      As a pilot subject to this horrible rule, I feel so bad for the SpaceX employees.

    9. It pays to bribe the current administration. They don’t care and will take as many bribes and ass kisses as they can. I don’t understand how people can still support this blatant corruption and very friendly laws towards the biggest payer of the administration… Americans don’t give a fuck about the wrong shit.

    10. Future-Bandicoot-823 on

      Dude.

      I saw a post saying Amtrak had lost the plot, a post where they were like „train supremacy for a thousand years!“ and then I saw a „railway ad“ during the superbowl…

      these fucks have been building backdoors into trains for the last 40 years to bypass the law… SONUVABITCH

      Who would have ever thought to look at train law!? watch it go right up the ladder and somehow the department of energy is involved, the absolute height of the secrecy pyramid. Nuclear secrets are DOE, all the good shit goes straight into DOE hands.

    11. throwawayainteasy on

      I know it sounds shady, but under the language of the Railway Labor Act (the law at hand here that preempts a lot of other labor laws), it seems like the right outcome.

      The RLA applies to rail and air carriers, and it uses statutory definitions set within the law itself rather than common-law definitions. So legal interpretations have to use that definition instead. The RLA defines a rail/air carrier as:

      > any company directly or indirectly owned, controlled by, or under common control with such a railroad or airline that operates equipment or facilities or performs services in connection with transportation of property or passengers

      While it doesn’t give an explicit definition for „airline“, it does treat basically anything that carries people or goods by air as an airline for its purposes.

      Given the definition the RLA, it seems pretty reasonable and way more legally consistent to call SpaceX an air carrier for the purposes of the RLA. SpaceX (and every private launch company) definitely carries goods and/or people by air–their rockets literally fly though the air, obviously, and they carry goods. By the usages of the words in the RLA, the fact that it’s not open to the general public isn’t a requirement to be a common carrier like it is for other non-rail/air companies.

      Sucks, but from the text of the laws I tend to agree with this outcome. Congress should change the laws to apply the common-law usage of „common carrier“ to airlines or make an explicit carve-out for space companies if they want this addressed. It shouldn’t be up to the NLRB (nor is it appropriate) to try and back-fit outdated laws with obsolete definitions to modern space companies.

    12. Exotic_Insurance2164 on

      At least previous generations had the decency to pretend that we didn’t live in a *pay to play* plutocracy. 

      The billionaire Epstein class are shamelessly thumbing their noses their noses at us.

    13. RottenPingu1 on

      I’m still laughing at Elon’s marketing campaign to prove he wasn’t welcome by the Trump mafia anymore.

    14. Future-Bandicoot-823 on

      Trying to win over the „special interest“ crowd, are we? Is this to make up for the acetaminophen comments?

    Leave A Reply