Pam Bondi hielt während der heutigen Anhörung ein Blatt Papier mit der Aufschrift „Suchverlauf“ der Kongressabgeordneten Jayapal Pramila in der Hand. Die Durchsuchungen beziehen sich alle auf Informationen in den Epstein-Dateien. Es scheint, dass Suchvorgänge im Zusammenhang mit den Epstein-Dateien vom DOJ verfolgt und gelesen werden.

    Von WhatYouThinkYouSee

    Share.

    13 Kommentare

    1. The party of small government in action

      Y’all are kidding yourselves if you think these people intend to allow a free and fair election in November

    2. WhatYouThinkYouSee on

      Submission Statement: During today’s hearing, Pam Bondi was seen holding a piece of paper containing the search history of Congresswoman Jayapal Pramila. The searches all pertained to files from the Epstein case. This means that the DOJ is monitoring and tracking the browsing history of people searching for information related to Epstein.

      Furthermore, the fact that the highlighted searches were all incriminating ones, with no mundane files in-between them, seems to suggest that the DOJ is specifically monitoring searches related to incriminating evidence.

      A news segment on the paper: https://x.com/atrupar/status/2021697529264410716?s=61

    3. RelativePatient3473 on

      I made a post about this. The company servicing the files is Akami technologies. Strong Israeli and IDF ties and many conflicts of interest. I am sure they’re colluding and collecting gobs of data. We need to look into them more. At minimum a major conflict of interest to hire this contractor.

    4. They need to stay away from windows and balconies. They’re tracking who has seen the real shit

    5. Ok_Arrival2564 on

      How the fuck is Kash still working? This mother fucker had the audacity to say he wasn’t a trafficker when all the reports THEY FUCKING GAVE US says otherwise.

    6. HilariousButTrue on

      Just another one of those provisions that government should not have over citizens yet they do due to the Patriot Act.

      It’s designed to counter terrorism but of course it’s abused due to the legal ambiguity in the language it was written in, on purpose of course.

    7. CallMeAlZutt on

      Where are the „freedumb“ MAGAs?

      Oh they were lying about that just like they were lying when they said they care about children?

    8. Yea, I would just assume they are or can read everything we send.

      It’s strange that she’s being so blatant about it. It would not shock me in the slightest if they shared their notes with each other before the hearing so they could give better performances.

    9. Extension-Carry-8067 on

      Not that this any better but since Congress has access to the doj computers to look stuff up the information could be pulled from that

    10. The Congress members that went to see the unredacted files had to specifically ask for which files they wanted to view. So I think „search history“ really just means „which unredacted files they requested“.

      I don’t think this points to the doj keeping track of who is viewing what on their website. But I mean… You’re on a . Gov website. It’s probably a good idea to assume they’re keeping track of what you’re doing.

    11. realdmbondemand on

      Where’s the fucking ground floor?!? Or does it just keep bottoming out? Every day something else happens that would make this a gripping political and criminal thriller if it weren’t real life, which just makes it non fiction horror.

      EDIT: a word

    Leave A Reply