Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Bluesky Threads [OC] Auch ohne Hosting verzeichnete SF einen Anstieg des Super Bowl-Verkehrs um +13 % – Santa Clara um +30 %, New Orleans (letztes Jahr) um +73 % Von fhoffa
fhoffa on 11.02.2026 12:07 a.m. Data source: [https://altitude.geotab.com/news-and-releases/super-bowl-commercial-traffic-impact/](https://altitude.geotab.com/news-and-releases/super-bowl-commercial-traffic-impact/) Tools: I took the data shared in the report, charts shared – and transformed it into a SVG with Claude to improve scaling for comparison purposes, and added clarity on years when the data was measured and how. The original chart: [https://altitude.geotab.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2026/02/super-bowl-blog-plot.png](https://altitude.geotab.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2026/02/super-bowl-blog-plot.png) Disclosure: I work at Geotab, and I love playing with this data.
1 Kommentar
Data source: [https://altitude.geotab.com/news-and-releases/super-bowl-commercial-traffic-impact/](https://altitude.geotab.com/news-and-releases/super-bowl-commercial-traffic-impact/)
Tools: I took the data shared in the report, charts shared – and transformed it into a SVG with Claude to improve scaling for comparison purposes, and added clarity on years when the data was measured and how.
The original chart: [https://altitude.geotab.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2026/02/super-bowl-blog-plot.png](https://altitude.geotab.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2026/02/super-bowl-blog-plot.png)
Disclosure: I work at Geotab, and I love playing with this data.