Close Menu
    Politics

    Epstein-Akten wurden geschwärzt, um „prominente“ Personen zu schützen, behaupten Gesetzgeber

    Share.
    View 36 Comments

    36 Kommentare

    1. B-Z_B-S on

      We all know that this DOJ is protecting the perpetrators rather than the victims. Pam Bondi isn’t being subtle about it.

    2. TheParadoxigm on

      No shit.

      Why else would they have redacted the „From“ line in emails to Epstein?

    3. monkeywithgun on

      Trumps Just Us Department hard at work for ~~the American taxpayers~~ Trump and Friends.

    4. transcriptoin_error on

      It’ll be interesting to see what Pam Bondi has to say (or not say) later this week. I’m not hopeful that she will be forthcoming, as she appears to be stalling and protecting the child-raping president.

      >Yet when the DOJ began releasing documents in recent weeks, many were so heavily redacted that they offered little new information.

      >“These six are just what we found in two hours of a review of the files,” Khanna said. “The broader issue is why so many of the files they’re getting are redacted in the first place.”

      >“What Americans want to know,” he added, “is who are the rich and powerful people who went to this island? Did they rape underage girls? Did they know that underage girls were being paraded around?”

    5. OkayButFoRealz on

      A ruling class international billionaire pedo cabal that reaches the highest echelons of many industries and governments.

    6. MagicalUnicornFart on

      We can only hope more competent foreign governments uncover information, and release on the world stage.

      The GOP and their donors aren’t going to let it come out here…and the D’s couldn’t fight their way out of a wet paper bag with scissors in each hand…wouldn’t want to upset their donors, or their colleagues „across the aisle.“ Any leverage Schumer or Jeffries get, will be pissed away on some nonsense decorum, or trust for the American Nazis.

    7. MJcorrieviewer on

      From H.R.4405 — 119th Congress (2025-2026):

      „No record shall be withheld, delayed, or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.“

    8. honestdale on

      Oh wow! What a bombshell! Absolutely none of us concluded this already.

      (for the dumb people, /s)

    12. KazeNilrem on

      This is all why by the end of trumps term, he is going to issue blanket pardons to all these people. They are so complicit and knees deep in shit that only way out is a pardon. Fact is they need to only redact the names of the children, the women, those that are actual victims. None of this bs that seems to be where they view trump as a victim.

    14. Lonely_Noyaaa on

      >Lawmakers from both parties allege that the Epstein files released by the Trump administration have been heavily redacted specifically to protect „prominent individuals“ named in the documents.

      They’re redacting the files to protect Trump and his billionaire friends. Release the unredacted files immediately or admit you’re protecting pedophile, there’s no other explanation for these redactions.

    16. baronofdirt on

      My bet is the talking point is something along the lines of: the names were redacted because they are the ‘victims’ of extortion/blackmail, and/or still the subject of ongoing investigations. Total bs to protect perpetrators, but I expect that to be the spin offered…

    18. DogonYaro on

      The United States Government is protecting a sprawling sex trafficking of minors.  Think about that.

    22. DogonYaro on

      If there was still integrity in public office, just the lewd post card Donald Trump sent to Jeffrey Epstein wishing both of them many more years of debauchery and perversion, is enough for impeachment.

    23. Fartenstein65 on

      Oh for fuc$s sakes: release the damn files entirely unredacted. Everyone knows they are protecting pedos and wealthy individuals and not the victims. Let the public know who ALL of the perpetrators are and let us decide what to do. We will expect the fullest punishment of the justice systems worldwide. Girls were raped and tortured for the pleasure of sick people who feel they are free of any sort of prosecution or are above the law.

    24. ranchspidey on

      Other countries seem to be cleaning house and I can only hope they’re forced to do so here as a result.

    26. tyrionlannister on

      It’s right there in the half covered ‚Elon Musk‘ that barely covered the top half of the words.

      Unless Musk was sexually assaulted, they’re violating the law.

      Same with the names of the detectives in that testimony from a victim who said she thought the cops or courts leaked the info because she was being threatened, and the only person she told was them..

      AND THAT’S JUST A COUPLE FILES I RANDOMLY OPENED.

      The whole thing is a freaking sham.

    27. Sweettooth4532 on

      Protect them from what? There are literally no consequences for anyone’s actions at the top

    28. waffle299 on

      Last week, someone found the same document twice, one redacted, one not. One word was redacted, „don’t“.

      But it was misspelled, a typo. The redacted sequence was „don T“.

      That, right there, was an illegal redaction.

    29. Positive-Room7421 on

      Insanity! What will DOJ do: refuse to provide the unredacted version and hope Trump’s allies will stall and cover until after the midterms, or use this time to replace the redacted name with a likely villain, like SpongeBob SquarePants?

    31. eternalguardian on

      Duh. They don’t want their names out there lest a vigilante actually do justice.

    33. tiktock34 on

      The craziest part of everything is that there WAS a swamp to drain. Pizzagate WAS real. The only diff from the story was that the swamp itself was the one screaming about the swamp and the people screaming about pizzagate were the biggest pizzalovers in the world.

    Leave A Reply