Close Menu
    Vereinigtes Königreich

    Wir haben eine öffentlich finanzierte Transport-App im Wert von 4 Millionen Pfund mit Google Maps getestet

    Share.
    View 10 Comments

    10 Kommentare

    1. Toastlove on

      I did have a random thought the other about how people would cope if Google/apple maps went down, I know a lot of people who just follow the instructions and pay zero attention to the route and wouldnt be able to do it again from memory, so more independant options wouldn’t be a bad thing.

    2. techbear72 on

      Also, the app was £1.5M not £4M; the extra £2.5M is money set aside for future expansion and development etc. which is likely a good thing as it’ll need to be maintained long term if it’s to remain useful.

    3. thepotofpine on

      Ok but why is our government spending money on this? We have open street maps and a host of competitors already to Google Maps. Google Maps just wins out because 9/10 they operate better and the UX is better (inb all the people in the comments say that one time a competitor app was better)

    5. Neyne_NA on

      So they designed a test to see which app will get them to their destination faster and easier. The guy who used the Ride East Midlands got there before the guy using Google Maps. His response?

      „I was really impressed with the Ride East Midlands app, but I wouldn’t say it’s a huge improvement on Google Maps or similar well-established guidance apps.“

      Sounds to me like somebody went into this „test“ with their mind already made up.

    6. HAH-PAH on

      Don’t see the point of this, they’re both calling the same APIs to get transport information anyway – they don’t explain what they’re trying to do differently

    7. Mba1956 on

      The BBC article casually wondered whether it was worth using the app to save 7 minutes, but that is 1hr 10 mins a week. Imagine the lambasting they would have given the app if it lost by 7 minutes.

      Also if it’s can do that with only £1.5m spent on development against the billions spent on Google maps then I say it is good value for money.

    8. floftie on

      Couple of points:

      I don’t want to download Ride East Midlands app for the one journey I take there every 3 years.

      I don’t know why I should trust a government service more than a private one – The fact this is East Midlands seems to be indicative of this problem – The different local authorities are separate from each other. As are the 37 different public bodies that all have input on this. Do I need a different app for every part of the country?Priv

      I don’t care about saving 7 minutes on a one off journey. If you need sat nav to navigate your commute every day, see a doctor.

      Some things don’t need public funding if there is a free to use private service. Also, nobody is forcing you to use Sat Nav. You can read a map and look at train listings.

      Private businesses do some things better than public bodies, by nature.

    9. HeartyBeast on

      The only thing, I’d say is:

      > „Feedback from the Mayor’s Big Transport Conversation shows that unreliable real-time information is a key barrier to using public transport.

      It sounds like spending some money on building a really robust system and APIs for existing mapping providers to use. I expect they explored this, though. 

    10. mapserve61 on

      I don’t think this is a good use of public money when there are pot holes galore, etc. Google maps and the other free transport apps service the vast majority of needs.

    Leave A Reply