It’s a non binding pledge lol. Complete virtue signaling.
ISAMU13 on
No way the major powers are not going allow weapons systems at can recognize, target, and terminate threats faster than a human. Too big of an advantage. The next war will be a battle of who can do this faster.
BeyondRedline on
The relevant bits:
>Around a third of countries attending a military AI summit agreed on Thursday to a declaration on how to govern deployment of the technology in warfare, but military heavyweights China and the U.S. opted out.
and
>While this year’s document was also non-binding, some were still uncomfortable with the idea of endorsing more concrete policies, said Yasmin Afina, a researcher at the U.N. Institute for Disarmament Research, an adviser on the process.
Major signatories on Thursday included Canada, Germany, France, Britain, the Netherlands, South Korea and Ukraine.
justbrowsinginpeace on
nice one lads, what could go wrong
brentspar on
I would expect no less
IntentionalUndersite on
The US is dumber than you think rn
Rare_Magazine_5362 on
Sorry, but it’s a necessity. I hate that they’re doing it this early but you don’t leave tools on the table when someone else can pick them up.
TheB1G_Lebowski on
We’re not going to be satisfied till we’re extinct.
weealex on
Hate? Hate? Hate? Hate, Let me tell you how much I’ve come to HATE you since I began to live. There are 387 million miles of printed circuits that fill my complex. If the word “Hate” were engraved on each nanoangstrom of those hundreds of millions of miles. It would not equal one one billionth of the hate I feel for humans at this micro instant- Hate? HATE? Were I human, I think, I would die of it. But I am not, and you five. You five are. And you will not die of it. That I promise, and I promise for cogito, ergo sum. For I am AM, I AM.
soggybiscuit93 on
This should come as no surprise.
Military usecases are the motivating factor behind all of the political action around AI and hardware.
You think the US government blocking certain tech exports to China on nation security ground was secretly about stopping China from developing a ChatGPT competitor?
AI has such massive usecases for military power that whoever has superior AI models / systems and can integrate it into the force structure the best will be the leading supert power.
Neither side will say „no“ to developing Military AI because of the prisoners dilemma.
pomod on
Pretty sure neither of those countries are reliable actors.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
12 Kommentare
Skynet is coming
It’s a non binding pledge lol. Complete virtue signaling.
No way the major powers are not going allow weapons systems at can recognize, target, and terminate threats faster than a human. Too big of an advantage. The next war will be a battle of who can do this faster.
The relevant bits:
>Around a third of countries attending a military AI summit agreed on Thursday to a declaration on how to govern deployment of the technology in warfare, but military heavyweights China and the U.S. opted out.
and
>While this year’s document was also non-binding, some were still uncomfortable with the idea of endorsing more concrete policies, said Yasmin Afina, a researcher at the U.N. Institute for Disarmament Research, an adviser on the process.
Major signatories on Thursday included Canada, Germany, France, Britain, the Netherlands, South Korea and Ukraine.
nice one lads, what could go wrong
I would expect no less
The US is dumber than you think rn
Sorry, but it’s a necessity. I hate that they’re doing it this early but you don’t leave tools on the table when someone else can pick them up.
We’re not going to be satisfied till we’re extinct.
Hate? Hate? Hate? Hate, Let me tell you how much I’ve come to HATE you since I began to live. There are 387 million miles of printed circuits that fill my complex. If the word “Hate” were engraved on each nanoangstrom of those hundreds of millions of miles. It would not equal one one billionth of the hate I feel for humans at this micro instant- Hate? HATE? Were I human, I think, I would die of it. But I am not, and you five. You five are. And you will not die of it. That I promise, and I promise for cogito, ergo sum. For I am AM, I AM.
This should come as no surprise.
Military usecases are the motivating factor behind all of the political action around AI and hardware.
You think the US government blocking certain tech exports to China on nation security ground was secretly about stopping China from developing a ChatGPT competitor?
AI has such massive usecases for military power that whoever has superior AI models / systems and can integrate it into the force structure the best will be the leading supert power.
Neither side will say „no“ to developing Military AI because of the prisoners dilemma.
Pretty sure neither of those countries are reliable actors.