Step 1: Remove constitutional requirements of preserving judiciary independence
Step 2: Appointment regime-friendly judges
Step 3: Do a bunch of illegal crap and get favorable decisions in the courts.
Blame federal liberals for lack of punishment for crime is just a little benefit for them….
mfrench105 on
NAL…but any time someone wants more influence over the administration of law…. demands a step back. Do we have the best system?…I don’t know….but any changes must withstand real scrutiny.
Our judges are mentally I’ll people who believe in the living tree
nommedeuser on
Anyone who wants to change how the legal system has worked for decades is ALWAYS UP TO NO GOOD.
ChristJesusDisciple on
So what’s the key to falling up?
Look good, around 6 ft tall, good public speaking. Anything else I’m missing?
TepHoBubba on
Aren’t those federally appointed judges specifically for appeals?
Plucky_DuckYa on
Whilst I can see why some people react negatively to this, there is actually a serious problem of the federal government essentially using the judiciary and their ability to control who is appointed to it as a means of encroaching on provincial jurisdiction and eroding their constitutional authority.
Smith has a point on this. Is her solution the right one? No idea. But anyone concerned about the division of powers in this country should agree the path we’ve been going down is creating problems and the status quo is no longer tenable.
zkwarl on
Since the article does not link to the open letter, here it is.
Why in the living hell are we still having to deal with Fraser after he completely fucked our immigration and housing?
If Carney has a “new liberal government” and we give a honest look and give Carney a chance.
But then you see he still has this incompetent minister that only fails upward, how does this help unite Canadians or put any faith that Carney will be any better than Trudeau?
It’s absolutely crazy that we have to see Fraser in the House of Commons.
Expensive_Society_56 on
How much longer must we suffer being the laughing stock of the dominion?
Tall-Ad-1386 on
What else is the historically most inept minister for every portfolio he’s ever held going to say
SkinnedIt on
So uh, what legally defined provincial oversight is Smith willing to open up for „say“ by the feds? None, right?
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
14 Kommentare
UCPs plan:
Step 1: Remove constitutional requirements of preserving judiciary independence
Step 2: Appointment regime-friendly judges
Step 3: Do a bunch of illegal crap and get favorable decisions in the courts.
Blame federal liberals for lack of punishment for crime is just a little benefit for them….
NAL…but any time someone wants more influence over the administration of law…. demands a step back. Do we have the best system?…I don’t know….but any changes must withstand real scrutiny.
Good on Fraser. We don’t want political judges.
I’ll just leave this here. https://nationalpost.com/feature/exclusive-data-analysis-reveals-liberals-appoint-judges-who-are-party-donors
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-pmo-vets-potential-judges-with-liberal-database/
Our judges are mentally I’ll people who believe in the living tree
Anyone who wants to change how the legal system has worked for decades is ALWAYS UP TO NO GOOD.
So what’s the key to falling up?
Look good, around 6 ft tall, good public speaking. Anything else I’m missing?
Aren’t those federally appointed judges specifically for appeals?
Whilst I can see why some people react negatively to this, there is actually a serious problem of the federal government essentially using the judiciary and their ability to control who is appointed to it as a means of encroaching on provincial jurisdiction and eroding their constitutional authority.
The McDonald Laurier Institute [recently released this study](https://macdonaldlaurier.ca/judging-the-provinces-charter-interpretation-and-the-erosion-of-provincial-autonomy-dave-snow-and-mark-harding/) which explains what’s been happening. It’s worth a read.
Smith has a point on this. Is her solution the right one? No idea. But anyone concerned about the division of powers in this country should agree the path we’ve been going down is creating problems and the status quo is no longer tenable.
Since the article does not link to the open letter, here it is.
https://www.alberta.ca/system/files/Jus-Premier-Smith-Letter-to-PM-Carney-judicial-appointments-Jan-23-2026.pdf
Why in the living hell are we still having to deal with Fraser after he completely fucked our immigration and housing?
If Carney has a “new liberal government” and we give a honest look and give Carney a chance.
But then you see he still has this incompetent minister that only fails upward, how does this help unite Canadians or put any faith that Carney will be any better than Trudeau?
It’s absolutely crazy that we have to see Fraser in the House of Commons.
How much longer must we suffer being the laughing stock of the dominion?
What else is the historically most inept minister for every portfolio he’s ever held going to say
So uh, what legally defined provincial oversight is Smith willing to open up for „say“ by the feds? None, right?