“Each blue dot represents a language” so everyone in Eurasia can’t speak?
kicklhimintheballs on
I find the lack of linguistic diversity in Tibet really interesting.
kartu3 on
A tale from the region: the God got tired sowing languages and emptied his sack near Caucasus.
kielu on
You can select a portion of PNG to get the same result
I_love_pillows on
Source?
JesusSwag on
The low resolution makes it almost impossible to actually see the blue dots
Responsible-Mud-8725 on
Yeah I am from Green area from Assam State in india and there are different languages in some villages with just 8,000 to 9,000 speakers like Tai languages like Khamti Turung and Khamyang while everyone can speak Assamess there are also various Kachari languages like Bodo ,Garo, Tiwa you could see people in same villages speaking several different languages
In the neighbouring states of Nagaland and Arunachal more then 150+ different languages are spoken
inamag1343 on
Then there’s also Maritime Southeast Asia and Papua New Guinea which also have crazy amount of diversity.
islander_guy on
Where are the blue dots?
ihatexboxha on
why do people speak so many languages
Trinitial-D on
this is super interesting, thanks. so strange that theres such extreme variation when you consider that people have lived in different regions for similar amounts of time
Laalvo on
And those regions are amongst the most mountainous in the world. More small isolated pockets of people. Makes sense.
Regulai on
Some big caveats;
* most of the 900 are Tibeto-burman languages.
* Tibeto burman has a few traits that lend towards rapid divergent shifts in language. Including:
* Mountain isolation
* Tones, which mean a slight change in pronunciation is the same as a new word. E.g. Saying Ta-May-To instead of To-Mah-to is akin to saying Bob instead of Tomato, just a completly different sound.
* Word order variance, most Tibeto-burman languages have a larger than usualy flexibility in the sentence order and structure, which can allow minor stylistic difference to have big structural differences e.g. you could optionally say either „I ate a Tomato“ or „Tomato I a ate“ in the same language.
* The differences here are technically no more extreme then minor dialect differences in a western language but combined can result in one town saying „I ate a tomato“ and another saying „Bob o er sole“ based off of extremly minor stylistic and accent choices.
The result is that two towns that speak the same language, can within a few generations speak languages so uninteligable it’s hard to tell they were ever related at all.
adigyran on
yay Caucasus mentioned. We are linguistics heaven
Eugene_Bleak_Slate on
Depends on the historical period. Before the Indo-European, Semitic, Dravidian, and Sino-Tibetan expansions, it was almost certainly not the case.
hideousox on
I know it’s (likely Indian sadly) bullshit because there are like 30 in Italy alone
66Kix_fix on
In NE India you have a different tribe speaking a different language every new village you cross. It is a unique characteristic of the highland areas with high ethnolinguistic diversity and also extends to south east Asia.
This presents an interesting issue where the nation states are unable to completely assimilate these highly diverse groups to the mainstream society as they resist control from the central state. Many groups in NE India are thus given autonomy like the Mizos and Bodos. There are many insurgencies across this region who want to cut off their land from the central state.
There is no one clear majority in these areas and people here have lived in isolated groups since millenias, developing their own very unique languages and cultures that is completely different from the central, low-lying areas.
I am from NE India myself and have observed this since childhood but only recently became aware that there is actually a term for describing this unique phenomenon.
My linguistic region (and several others) lies in both regions. What’s the source of this map (not the data)?
Tennist4ts on

Looks like that painting
modsaretoddlers on
It’s fascinating but I don’t think we can really draw much information from this. I mean, the pink area really represents a dead zone more than anything. I don’t mean it’s „dead“ like nothing is happening or whatever but rather that the vast majority of languages that developed in the pink zone were wiped out and replaced in the relatively recent past.
Rati05 on
GEORGIA LETS GO 🇬🇪🇬🇪🇬🇪🇬🇪🇬🇪🇬🇪
გაუმარჯოს!!!!
iHave_Thehigh_Ground on
Now do Africa
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
24 Kommentare
“Each blue dot represents a language” so everyone in Eurasia can’t speak?
I find the lack of linguistic diversity in Tibet really interesting.
A tale from the region: the God got tired sowing languages and emptied his sack near Caucasus.
You can select a portion of PNG to get the same result
Source?
The low resolution makes it almost impossible to actually see the blue dots
Yeah I am from Green area from Assam State in india and there are different languages in some villages with just 8,000 to 9,000 speakers like Tai languages like Khamti Turung and Khamyang while everyone can speak Assamess there are also various Kachari languages like Bodo ,Garo, Tiwa you could see people in same villages speaking several different languages
In the neighbouring states of Nagaland and Arunachal more then 150+ different languages are spoken
Then there’s also Maritime Southeast Asia and Papua New Guinea which also have crazy amount of diversity.
Where are the blue dots?
why do people speak so many languages
this is super interesting, thanks. so strange that theres such extreme variation when you consider that people have lived in different regions for similar amounts of time
And those regions are amongst the most mountainous in the world. More small isolated pockets of people. Makes sense.
Some big caveats;
* most of the 900 are Tibeto-burman languages.
* Tibeto burman has a few traits that lend towards rapid divergent shifts in language. Including:
* Mountain isolation
* Tones, which mean a slight change in pronunciation is the same as a new word. E.g. Saying Ta-May-To instead of To-Mah-to is akin to saying Bob instead of Tomato, just a completly different sound.
* Word order variance, most Tibeto-burman languages have a larger than usualy flexibility in the sentence order and structure, which can allow minor stylistic difference to have big structural differences e.g. you could optionally say either „I ate a Tomato“ or „Tomato I a ate“ in the same language.
* The differences here are technically no more extreme then minor dialect differences in a western language but combined can result in one town saying „I ate a tomato“ and another saying „Bob o er sole“ based off of extremly minor stylistic and accent choices.
The result is that two towns that speak the same language, can within a few generations speak languages so uninteligable it’s hard to tell they were ever related at all.
yay Caucasus mentioned. We are linguistics heaven
Depends on the historical period. Before the Indo-European, Semitic, Dravidian, and Sino-Tibetan expansions, it was almost certainly not the case.
I know it’s (likely Indian sadly) bullshit because there are like 30 in Italy alone
In NE India you have a different tribe speaking a different language every new village you cross. It is a unique characteristic of the highland areas with high ethnolinguistic diversity and also extends to south east Asia.
This presents an interesting issue where the nation states are unable to completely assimilate these highly diverse groups to the mainstream society as they resist control from the central state. Many groups in NE India are thus given autonomy like the Mizos and Bodos. There are many insurgencies across this region who want to cut off their land from the central state.
There is no one clear majority in these areas and people here have lived in isolated groups since millenias, developing their own very unique languages and cultures that is completely different from the central, low-lying areas.
I am from NE India myself and have observed this since childhood but only recently became aware that there is actually a term for describing this unique phenomenon.
[It’s called Zomia or South East Asian Massif](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeast_Asian_Massif)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_migrations
Here’s a post that gives much more detail:
[https://www.reddit.com/r/LinguisticMaps/comments/1qpo7r2/these_hills_and_mountains_of_asia_may_contain/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button](https://www.reddit.com/r/LinguisticMaps/comments/1qpo7r2/these_hills_and_mountains_of_asia_may_contain/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button)
My linguistic region (and several others) lies in both regions. What’s the source of this map (not the data)?

Looks like that painting
It’s fascinating but I don’t think we can really draw much information from this. I mean, the pink area really represents a dead zone more than anything. I don’t mean it’s „dead“ like nothing is happening or whatever but rather that the vast majority of languages that developed in the pink zone were wiped out and replaced in the relatively recent past.
GEORGIA LETS GO 🇬🇪🇬🇪🇬🇪🇬🇪🇬🇪🇬🇪
გაუმარჯოს!!!!
Now do Africa