Share.

    2 Kommentare

    1. ForeignAffairsMag on

      [Excerpt from essay by Ilan Goldenberg, Senior Vice President and Chief Policy Officer at J Street; and Nate Swanson, Resident Senior Fellow and Director of the Iran Strategy Project at the Atlantic Council.]

      Whether Trump ultimately becomes the most consequential U.S. president for Iran since Jimmy Carter or merely an accelerant of instability will hinge on whether his administration can move beyond improvisation and develop a coherent strategy. A plan that carefully coordinates military restraint, economic pressure, and support for the opposition, all while keeping the door open to diplomatic solutions with Tehran, could yield a managed transition from the current regime to new leadership that benefits the Iranian people, the United States, and the Middle East. If the administration continues with its scattershot approach, however, the United States could find itself drawn into a prolonged military confrontation with Iran that only further destabilizes the country and causes yet more suffering for Iranians.

    2. vovap_vovap on

      Lots of words not as much meaning. How exactly US will support opposition? Current requirement to Iran does not include any about it. Zero. Why regime should transform then? Only deep idea that if they agreed to those requirement that would demonstrate internally how week they are and that will prompt revolution. Long shot I would say 🙂 In reality only thing they really want – not to be touched no matter what. And that sort of what we show to them is Ok „we do not care what are you doing internally as far as not doing nuks and missiles“
      So why exactly regime will change?

    Leave A Reply