„Eighteen civilians, 15 security personnel and 92 insurgents were killed“ the military said.
I’m trying to wrap my head around these numbers, that seems like such an unheard of ratio to attackers vs victims.
You usually hear of 1-2 attackers having a higher number of victims, not the other way around.
Hicklethumb on
Isn’t Pakistan a nuclear power?
SARMS86 on
> Pakistan’s military said on Saturday that multiple suicide and gun attacks by “terrorists” across the restive south-western province of Balochistan killed 33 people, including civilians, while security forces responding to the violence killed 92 assailants.
> Analysts described it as the deadliest single day for militants in decades.
> During the attacks, Baloch insurgents targeted civilians, a high-security prison, police stations and paramilitary installations. Eighteen civilians, 15 security personnel and 92 insurgents were killed, the military said.
> Though Baloch separatists and the Pakistani Taliban frequently target security forces in Balochistan and elsewhere in the country, coordinated attacks on this scale are rare. Authorities said at least 133 militants have been killed across Balochistan over the past 48 hours, including 92 on Saturday.
> The military and Pakistan’s interior minister Mohsin Naqvi said the attackers had the backing of India.
No surprise they would blame India here. They would blame India either way.
Also of note: Within this short quote, the attackers are described as Terrorists, Baloch Insurgents and Baloch Separatists. It’s as if the author was trying to cover all their bases and demonstrates how word choice matters.
Stunning_Idea930 on
When you grow a snake in your backyard it will bite you one day
Super_Piper on
ItS aLl IsRaEl’s fault right liberals?
Thornyx_Zetral on
„If you harbor a snake in your backyard, don’t be surprised when it bites you“
Aintyodad on
Park army needs to come to Ontario Canada if they want to end the Balochi terrorists
ReasonablyBadass on
The province is a huge part of the country, but has apparently very little people.
Tough_Oven_7890 on
Soon there will be news from Pakistan saying, **“India is behind this.”**
With all these terrorist activities, it’s always civilians who die, while politicians just blame other countries to gain votes.
Empty_Put_1542 on
Serious question: what’s up with that whole geographical region? I know people kill each other everywhere, it just seems like a lot over in that region of earth.
lexxwern on
The Pakistani state’s writ does not exist in most parts of Balochistan and Pashtunistan / Khyber-Pakthunwa regions. Even their military and law enforcements centers have been hit regularly for the last 3 years.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
12 Kommentare
Stone age mentality in a nutshell
„Eighteen civilians, 15 security personnel and 92 insurgents were killed“ the military said.
I’m trying to wrap my head around these numbers, that seems like such an unheard of ratio to attackers vs victims.
You usually hear of 1-2 attackers having a higher number of victims, not the other way around.
Isn’t Pakistan a nuclear power?
> Pakistan’s military said on Saturday that multiple suicide and gun attacks by “terrorists” across the restive south-western province of Balochistan killed 33 people, including civilians, while security forces responding to the violence killed 92 assailants.
> Analysts described it as the deadliest single day for militants in decades.
> During the attacks, Baloch insurgents targeted civilians, a high-security prison, police stations and paramilitary installations. Eighteen civilians, 15 security personnel and 92 insurgents were killed, the military said.
> Though Baloch separatists and the Pakistani Taliban frequently target security forces in Balochistan and elsewhere in the country, coordinated attacks on this scale are rare. Authorities said at least 133 militants have been killed across Balochistan over the past 48 hours, including 92 on Saturday.
> The military and Pakistan’s interior minister Mohsin Naqvi said the attackers had the backing of India.
No surprise they would blame India here. They would blame India either way.
Also of note: Within this short quote, the attackers are described as Terrorists, Baloch Insurgents and Baloch Separatists. It’s as if the author was trying to cover all their bases and demonstrates how word choice matters.
When you grow a snake in your backyard it will bite you one day
ItS aLl IsRaEl’s fault right liberals?
„If you harbor a snake in your backyard, don’t be surprised when it bites you“
Park army needs to come to Ontario Canada if they want to end the Balochi terrorists
The province is a huge part of the country, but has apparently very little people.
Soon there will be news from Pakistan saying, **“India is behind this.”**
With all these terrorist activities, it’s always civilians who die, while politicians just blame other countries to gain votes.
Serious question: what’s up with that whole geographical region? I know people kill each other everywhere, it just seems like a lot over in that region of earth.
The Pakistani state’s writ does not exist in most parts of Balochistan and Pashtunistan / Khyber-Pakthunwa regions. Even their military and law enforcements centers have been hit regularly for the last 3 years.