[OC] In den letzten drei Jahren habe ich in meinem Unternehmen (FAANG) Menschen zu Blind dazu befragt, wie besorgt sie darüber sind, dass KI sie ersetzen könnte
Dies wird in Prozent pro Antwort in zwei verschiedenen Diagrammformen angegeben. Die typische Gesamtsumme aller Antworten lag bei etwa 800 Stimmen pro Umfrage.
It’s also worth noting during this time our company leadership changed their tone from „AI will be used as a tool“ to „AI will end up replacing roles and retraining is needed“
[deleted] on
[deleted]
wheresmydegreeeee on
…did AI pick how to set up these charts? This data is not beautiful.
e136 on
What type of job do they have? All software eng? Or varied jobs?
szleven on
This is not beautiful at all
guhman123 on
i spent way too long trying to understand how the second graph was different from the first. i think its time to go to bed
syphax on
Might I suggest a stacked bar chart?
Informal_Quit_4845 on
The irony of the data being presented like shit tells me you’re first on the chopping block buddy 😂
Brambletail on
Is this corporate gas lighting or are agents much better in house than the agents being sold 🤣
no_4 on
Huh, not my experience. At my company we have a big push to utilize AI.
The technical people are struggling to come up with use cases (beyond what it has already done – become a partial replacement for Google and forums).
The non technical people are excited though. „You mean it can summarize my inbox! I can produce nice looking yet still irrelevant project plans in 10% the time!“ Etc.
It’s getting better, but…it almost feels like another fundamental breakthrough is needed (beyond the initial one that made LLMs practical to run). There’s so much money being thrown at them and yet…
I’m falling back on „can’t predict the future“.
evangelism2 on
Interesting seeing as the tone at my company has been cooling and I hear the same over the top language calming down even from people like OpenAI. Recently I was on a codex demo with them and they were talking about how its great with a human. Instead of a human being useless, and this is a total replacement for them. The models have plateau’d
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
11 Kommentare
It’s also worth noting during this time our company leadership changed their tone from „AI will be used as a tool“ to „AI will end up replacing roles and retraining is needed“
[deleted]
…did AI pick how to set up these charts? This data is not beautiful.
What type of job do they have? All software eng? Or varied jobs?
This is not beautiful at all
i spent way too long trying to understand how the second graph was different from the first. i think its time to go to bed
Might I suggest a stacked bar chart?
The irony of the data being presented like shit tells me you’re first on the chopping block buddy 😂
Is this corporate gas lighting or are agents much better in house than the agents being sold 🤣
Huh, not my experience. At my company we have a big push to utilize AI.
The technical people are struggling to come up with use cases (beyond what it has already done – become a partial replacement for Google and forums).
The non technical people are excited though. „You mean it can summarize my inbox! I can produce nice looking yet still irrelevant project plans in 10% the time!“ Etc.
It’s getting better, but…it almost feels like another fundamental breakthrough is needed (beyond the initial one that made LLMs practical to run). There’s so much money being thrown at them and yet…
I’m falling back on „can’t predict the future“.
Interesting seeing as the tone at my company has been cooling and I hear the same over the top language calming down even from people like OpenAI. Recently I was on a codex demo with them and they were talking about how its great with a human. Instead of a human being useless, and this is a total replacement for them. The models have plateau’d