Dieser Typ kaufte im Jahr 2021 den NFT des ersten Tweets der Geschichte für 2,9 Millionen US-Dollar und nannte ihn digitale Mona Lisa, und jetzt ist er 10 US-Dollar wert.
https://i.redd.it/ibfrxt3wtrfg1.jpeg
Dieser Typ kaufte im Jahr 2021 den NFT des ersten Tweets der Geschichte für 2,9 Millionen US-Dollar und nannte ihn digitale Mona Lisa, und jetzt ist er 10 US-Dollar wert.
https://i.redd.it/ibfrxt3wtrfg1.jpeg
34 Kommentare
Ah the NFT craze. So many made a quick buck. So many holding something as useless as 2nd hand toilet paper.
I mean, it could be worse. It could be 5 USD.
At the time, I remember thinking it was a wise decision
Where does it show it’s only worth $10? People still buy high valued NFTs. $10 seems super fake
Hope he sold it at the top
Very little value in NFT’s tbh in my view
I mean I guess I’d bid 15$ on it then
He can sell it for $10 to a „friend“ and offset the loss for the gain.
These guys should have tens (if not hundreds) of millions of unrealized capital gains
I’ll buy it for USD 11
I would fact check this claim, it sounds wrong when a random nobody like myself is willing to pay at least $11
Been saying since NFTs first became a hype:
NFTs *as a technology* are an awesome idea for logistics, ownership validation, and other on-chain management of real world *things*.
But NFTs are worthless on their own. Owning an NFT of an image of a monkey? Owning an NFT of a tweet? Worthless. Absolutely worthless. Or in this case, worth 0.00034% of the original investment.
The clue to NFT values is that before people even heard of them, they would have had no value. It was meaningless. People ascribed arbitrary value to the after that and it was obvious they were all going to nothing. NFT assets would one day return to the value they started with: nothing, or $1.00 etc.
What’s worse is when twitter abandoned their nft experiment most of these were lost
I’d buy it for $100
NFT era was the worse lol
NFTs were just another way to use crypto for money laundering and similar.
I wouldn’t give $1.
even the loch ness monster wouldn’t pay $3.50 for it.
I never believed that.
I always felt most of the really high dollar NFT sales were just straight up money laundering. With occasional deluded idiots thrown in for good measure.
One of the few NFT projects that actually built something and is still using the concept of nfts the right way is Asprey Studio… All NFT’s come with a 18 kt golden ring which’s gold value currently is close to floor price. IRL events in london, art gallery that is actually doing really well. Exclusive collabs with Marvel, Bugatti etc.
Ahh NFT’s my first short term big hit.
And not even on NFT’s but i was sitting on a buttload of theta and tfuel.
The only use case for NFT’s is to allow users to own their loot in video game marketplaces. Unfortunately very few games have done it correctly and none of them could be classed as AAA.
First – this nft is not on sale as of today so you can’t know the price (definitely not millions today but who knows about future). Second – crypto is roller coaster which means – today you are laughing, tomorrow you are crying from fomo and that’s on repeat.
Money Laundering thats all NFTs were
I hope AI follows suit
It’s worth what someone is willing to pay for it and that’s obviously more than $10. There are a lot of morons out there. Including the one who paid $2.9M for this.
🤣🤣
lol @ nft’s
K
I have a printed image of the first tweet. $1M and I’ll frame it for you.
I remember Gary Vaynerchuk spouting how NFTs were going to be huge and we should all buy what we could. Thats when I knew they’d be a monumental flop.
Where can we buy it for $10?
you’re all missing the hilarity of how hyped he was to sell it only to realise no one cared lol
That’s great