Tbf I trust Barron Trump about as far as I can throw him (not far)
Impressive-Bird-6085 on
I’d take most of what a member of the Trump family says with a massive doses of caution…. ⚠️!!
maxc1999 on
Judging baron trump of his fathers actions will only push him further to being an absolute cunt. As far as I know he’s done nothing wrong other than being born.
thecarbonkid on
The shit apple doesn’t fall far from the shit tree Randy
SP1570 on
If the judge instructed the jury this way, there must be a reason…but his surname is not (and cannot be) that reason.
We are talking about a woman being (allegedly) beaten here…I hope she gets the justice she (allegedly) deserves
Note: (allegedly) is there because I fully recognise that I don’t know the details of the case
przhauukwnbh on
> He added: „He might also have been asked whether his perception was biased because he was close friends with [the complainant].“
> The judge said hearsay evidence could be considered, but jurors should be „careful“ as it had not been given under oath and should „not convict the defendant mainly in reliance on it.“
What a shit headline.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
6 Kommentare
Tbf I trust Barron Trump about as far as I can throw him (not far)
I’d take most of what a member of the Trump family says with a massive doses of caution…. ⚠️!!
Judging baron trump of his fathers actions will only push him further to being an absolute cunt. As far as I know he’s done nothing wrong other than being born.
The shit apple doesn’t fall far from the shit tree Randy
If the judge instructed the jury this way, there must be a reason…but his surname is not (and cannot be) that reason.
We are talking about a woman being (allegedly) beaten here…I hope she gets the justice she (allegedly) deserves
Note: (allegedly) is there because I fully recognise that I don’t know the details of the case
> He added: „He might also have been asked whether his perception was biased because he was close friends with [the complainant].“
> The judge said hearsay evidence could be considered, but jurors should be „careful“ as it had not been given under oath and should „not convict the defendant mainly in reliance on it.“
What a shit headline.