Meta versucht, Erwähnungen von psychischer Gesundheit – und Zuckerbergs Harvard-Vergangenheit – aus dem Kindersicherheitsprozess auszuschließen | Der Prozess gegen Meta in New Mexico beginnt bald – und das Unternehmen setzt alles daran, seinen Ruf zu schützen.
https://www.wired.com/story/meta-child-safety-trial-ask-judge-bar-mental-health-harvard/
15 Kommentare
What reputation? Legit asking is there anyone out there that still has a positive view of Facebook and Zuckerberg?
One scandal after another for Meta, of course, they just pay and everything is resolved
His wife is a pediatrician FFS
Imagine turning a blind eye to this so you can have more money you’ll never be able to spend
That he’s a massive prick? The public knows already!
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution should crush these emotional child Safety and „mental health“ arguments, even if people hate Zuckerberg and Meta – [Patterson v. Meta (Reddit, Google, Snapchat, Amazon, Discord, 4chan)](https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/07/social-media-services-arent-liable-for-buffalo-mass-shooting-patterson-v-meta.htm)
>Thus, the interplay between section 230 and the First Amendment gives rise to a „Heads I Win, Tails You Lose“ proposition in favor of the social media defendants. Either the social media defendants are immune from civil liability under section 230 on the theory that their content-recommendation algorithms do not deprive them of their status as publishers of third-party content, per Force and M.P., or they are protected by the First Amendment on the theory that the algorithms create first-party content, as per Anderson. Of course, section 230 immunity and First Amendment protection are not mutually exclusive, and in our view the social media defendants are protected by both. Under no circumstances are they protected by neither.
My instagram feed yesterday was full of multiple adverts for porn sites complete with graphic videos.
What Reputation lol
I’m comfortable saying that Mark Zuckerberg is not just a dummy who got rich by coding a lousy web app, but is actually evil. His lack of care for the protection of children, his willingness to elevate political misinformation, his willingness to burn billions of dollars on his various whims while people are unhoused, hungry, and struggling to survive. All of these guys are awful, but Zuck is a whole different level of evil. Luckily for him, he doesn’t understand human emotion, so he’ll never have to reckon with how terrible his very existence has been for society and the world, or how history will view him as a villain.
I wish that website would just die already. I logged on there for the first time in about two years the other day and…….. wow. First „article“ post I saw was an obvious AI generated image of Lewis Hamilton topless with a bunch of other topless dudes on a yacht with „F1 champions secret gay love life revealed!“
It’s just astonishing levels of AI trash these days. I’m out Zuckerborg.
Haven’t used Facebook in years, Amazon and Spotify are deleted, reddits proberly next.
I don’t support nazis
Zuckerberg is part of the pedo party
Too late. You suck.
I highly recommend the Behind The Bastards podcast episodes about him. He’s so much worse than may people know.
https://youtu.be/srIt1RFE-Zo?si=EvdKNdCxkhFhCkCo
Protect its reputation as an exploiter of vulnerable people, especially children?
Meta has no reputation to protect. It is one of the most evil companies on the planet.