Close Menu
    Kanada

    Poilievre bezeichnet Carneys Davos-Rede als „gut gemacht“, meint aber, dass Taten folgen müssen

    Share.
    View 39 Comments

    39 Kommentare

    1. OneMoreTime998 on

      What does Poilievre know about action? 20 years in politics and never accomplished a damn thing other than blowing a 20-30pt lead and losing his own damn seat. Poilievre is an expert on losing.

    2. Veaeate on

      6 page response? Jesus. And in it he couldn’t help but attack the liberals. Good lord. How the cons actually want this guy to be leader is beyond me.

    3. Inevitable_Fuel7244 on

      Not a fan of PP but he is right. People are going to find something to complain about with his comment, but given it’s his job to basically criticize everything Carney does, him giving a compliment here shows how much that speech resonated across party lines. Here’s to hoping PP, Carney, and the premieres can band together in a positive way over the coming months.

    5. semucallday on

      > „If Liberal words and good intentions were tradable commodities, Canada would already be the richest nation on earth,“ Poilievre wrote. „Unfortunately, **after a decade of promises and grand speeches**, Liberals have made our economy more costly and dependent than ever before.“

      They don’t get that this just doesn’t land. The electorate doesn’t see the Trudeau Liberals and Carney Liberals as one continuous government.

      The electorate sees the Carney Liberals as though it’s a newly elected party. PP is not going to convince people otherwise.

    6. adamast0r on

      It’s true. We need more domestic action, not just international moralizing, no matter how well-crafted it is

    7. Candid_Pirate_7952 on

      I’ll take whatever crumbs of kindness and bipartisanship we can get from him lol

    10. Ok-Swimmer-2634 on

      If you go to Poilievre’s Instagram, his last post is about Carney’s „new carbon tax.“ He did share an article from Conservative MP Michelle Garner discussing the speech on his IG story (stories disappear after 24 hours) but has not put up any standing response to Carney on his Instagram.

      I think this is interesting. He kinda concedes that Carney’s speech wasn’t bad, but he can’t permanently broadcast that to his audience because he knows they’ll eat him alive over it.

    12. Appropriate-Ruin-17 on

      Glad to hear a bit of steadiness from PP, keep it constructive! The official opposition is an important and competent voice , also easier to hear if it’s focused, insightful, rather than cutting and jabbing. We need a diversity of voices in these times. I would love to see a liberal cabinet that included a few conservatives if relations were better!!

    13. Shjfty on

      I mean fuck PP but he’s right. Big words need to be followed by big actions or else you’re just another shit politician

    14. YeetCompleet on

      > Conservatives are „as always“ willing to work with the prime minister to „turn these words into results.

      Brother if you cared about results you would’ve taken your result in Carleton and left

    16. Woodrov on

      PP would have been more effective not saying anything for a week. The shine hasn’t come off the Carney speech.

      Entering the fray now – with a shitty message – simply reinforces how tone deaf the guy is. He’ll somehow lose the Alberta seat he “won”

    17. HARRYSH0ULDERS on

      If Conservatives doom and gloom and conspiracy talk were tradable commodities.
      F🍁ck Poilievre

    18. Subawuwrxcanada on

      Now, if only BC, Quebec, and Alberta could start agreeing on progress.

      Quebec should be stripped of equalization payments if it is not willing to support pipelines.

      BC should also allow pipelines—this would create jobs in the province. The BC NDP barely won any seats outside Metro Vancouver and lost heavily in ethnic areas such as Richmond and Surrey.

      Alberta, on the other hand, should tone down its anti-Canada campaigns.

    20. rawkinghorse on

      Am I dreaming? PP said something positive? I’m not sure I know how to process this

    26. ChatamKay on

      Wait, this flip flopper was just complaining Carney was wasting time flying around the world. So which is it, get a deal with Trump or diversity? This asshole can’t make up his mind.

    27. TSAforlife on

      Where has he been? Carney has been in motion for some time now, fostering new alliances and creating new trade deals.

    28. armageddonanyone on

      Well, Mr Carney was, among other things, reporting on action taken.

      I imagine, he probably won’t sit on his thumbs for the duration of his time in office.

      More action is bound to follow

    29. ZestyBeanDude on

      >In his response, Poilievre acknowledged that „no one can control what President Trump does or says,“ but said the reality is that Canada still lives next door to the largest economy and military on earth — and that while diversifying trade is essential, Canada’s security and trade relationship with the U.S. **will outlast one president**.

      Hmmm that’s funny, I could’ve sworn people said the same thing after January 6th, that Trumpism and MAGA was finished and never be seen again, yet here we are.

      People seem to easily forget that Obama campaigned against NAFTA in 2008 (albeit he did soften his tone once in office), or that Bush Jr. was screwing around with import duties on softwood lumber. We’re kidding ourselves if we think that there isn’t a reasonably large group in the US that actively wants to demolish North American free trade.

    34. eltuna3636 on

      Poilievre must hate Carney so much, Trudeau legitimately was a very poor leader and a lot of what PP said was true but with Carney the message just doesn’t land. PP’s mudslinging strategy just doesn’t work against someone like Carney.

      Even Carney’s biggest haters will admit that his competence is obvious, I usually lean to the right and easily would have voted PP over Trudeau but Carney won me over quickly.

      If Carney ran for the Conservatives instead of the Liberals it would have been a runaway landslide for the Conservatives

    35. typec4st on

      100% agreed.

      Housing starts are trending down. What happened to the election promises?

      We started importing cheap workers again – TFW and LMIA restarted for low wage positions in Vancouver, Winnipeg, Halifax and Montreal. I believe we were promised negative immigration?

      Food inflation is highest amongst G7 countries. This hurts everyone, but hurts low income families the most. I don’t see anyone in the government even remotely touching this issue. I believe we were promised affordability.

      Nice speech overall, give that speech writer a raise, but action must follow and so far it’s not.

    36. Adventurous-Hand3942 on

      The speech was so good the opposition party can’t complain. That means the speech was absolutely amazing then.

    38. holymolt on

      Happy to see that he acknowledged that it was a good speech. Truthfully, I didn’t expect that. The official opposition plays an important role and Poilievre’s response seems measured and professional with the intention of holding the government to account. That’s what we need right now. And for god sakes, no more silly slogans.

      (Truthfully, I didn’t read it all and am commenting based on the article linked by OP)

    39. Expensive_Plant_9530 on

      Just imagine how painful it was for Poilievre to even say “well crafted”. Must have been like pulling teeth for him.

      As for “action must follow”, sure. I agree. But I’ll be betting on Carney on this one.

      Still, I hope this is the beginning of a new trend for Poilievre and that he will *finally* be ready to be part of real bipartisan change.

    Leave A Reply