Close Menu
    Technik

    Comic-Con verbietet KI-Kunst nach Künstler-Pushback

    Share.
    View 25 Comments

    25 Kommentare

    4. WastelandOutlaw007 on

      Pathetic.

      This AI hate is just regurgitated photoshop/cgi hate, for the next generation in Technology

      When the star wars crew moved from stop motion, to CGI, the same „its the end of artists“ madness was spewed forth. Yet decades later, artists are still around.

      Edit: I find it vastly amusing, that after the comments, the reasons put forth, is hate of art being available to a wider audience, and its breaking down the walls around a gatekeeping community thats pissed people are now able to do what used to be limited to them

      After all, any claims that skill should be required to „create art“ is absolutely destroyed by the art world deeming a banana taped to a wall was art worth millions

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comedian_(artwork)

    6. Zahgi on

      Because you have to pay for admittance and the artist area is a HUGE draw at Comic-Con, they were forced to comply. Good.

      But they should have done it for the right reasons before anyone even had to complain…

    7. adamkopacz on

      They can generate their own comic-con, right? It will cost them nothing and they can have all the fun. I’m sure people love paying for stuff that no one took any effort to create.

    9. HiveInMind on

      A local con I frequent caught a vendor selling AI art. Then the vendor tried to gain sympathy from the other vendors, claiming they should have been proud that more people were getting into art, even if they weren’t making it themselves. Of course, nobody was buying it, and they went on a Facebook tirade when they got kicked out, calling everyone „broke bitches“ lol

    11. 404mediaco on

      Thanks for sharing our piece. More context here:

      San Diego Comic-Con changed an AI art friendly policy following an artist-led backlash last week. It was a small victory for working artists in an industry where jobs are slipping away as movie and video game studios adopt generative AI tools to save time and money. 

      Every year, tens of thousands of people descend on San Diego for Comic-Con, the world’s premier comic book convention that over the years has also become a major pan-media event where every major media company announces new movies, TV shows, and video games. For the past few years, Comic-Con has allowed some forms of AI-generated art at this art show at the convention. According to [archived rules](https://web.archive.org/web/20240724010823/https://www.comic-con.org/cc/things-to-do/art-show/) for the show, artists could display AI-generated material so long as it wasn’t for sale, was marked as AI-produced, and credited the original artist whose style was used.

      “Material produced by Artificial Intelligence (AI) may be placed in the show, but only as Not-for-Sale (NFS). It must be clearly marked as AI-produced, not simply listed as a print. If one of the parameters in its creation was something similar to ‘Done in the style of,’ that information must be added to the description. If there are questions, the Art Show Coordinator will be the sole judge of acceptability,” Comic-Con’s art show rules said until recently.

      These rules have been in place since at least 2024, but anti-AI sentiment is growing in the artistic community and an artist-led backlash against Comic-Con’s AI-friendly language led to the convention quietly changing the rules. Twenty-four hours after artists called foul the AI-friendly policy, Comic-Con updated the language on its site. “Material created by Artificial Intelligence (AI) either partially or wholly, is not allowed in the art show,” it now says. AI is now banned at the art show.

      Read more: [https://www.404media.co/comic-con-bans-ai-art-after-artist-pushback/](https://www.404media.co/comic-con-bans-ai-art-after-artist-pushback/)

    13. saltedsavior on

      Should be enforceable in the immediate while AI is still advancing because it’s still making some small mistakes. Won’t be too long though before it’s absolutely perfect and a visual scrutiny is not going to cut it so what are you going to do then?

    17. Darqnyz7 on

      Prompt Jockeys remind me of conservatives on dating apps. They hate the people that are there, but REFUSE to create their own space because they CRAVE the proximity to those people. They want to be validated by people who come to see art. Getting their dick stepped on like this absolutely sends the right message.

    19. green_link on

      AI ‚art‘ isn’t art. it’s slop that is based on stolen art. there’s no human aspect to it and should be banned from all art showcases, galleries, and shops

    20. maikuxblade on

      I can’t wait until something kicks off the class action lawsuit regarding AI being trained on art without compensation to the artists. AI “art” is just regurgitating stolen work.

    22. zushiba on

      Why did this require pushback in the first place? AI art shouldn’t be used for anything other than placeholder.

    24. OttersWithPens on

      You, the reader, are not allowed to enjoy AI art and any opposite opinion is wrong and you should be shamed because of other opinionated people. /S

      This comment section is pathetic. The frothing mouth anti-ai crowd is so loathsome. Art is only half the creation of a comic book, and AI art is a benefit to writers.

    Leave A Reply