Schlagwörter
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Karte
Karten
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Map
Maps
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Polen
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
Ukraine War Video Report
UkraineWarVideoReport
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News

7 Kommentare
*Younes was on the program to discuss the state of civil liberties in Donald Trump’s America, and Stewart thanked her for her principles and for trying to protect vulnerable people.*
Article complains this individual wasn’t questioned about covid. She wasn’t on to talk about covid. If she was on to talk about that stewart would be asked.
Someone who recently worked for Jim „child tape enabler“ Jordan and endorsed RFK Jr being painted by Stewart as a radical centrist is incredibly laughable.
Meh, I don’t care. Civil Rights attorneys are not always going to represent the most moral characters, because everyone deserves equality, no matter their views or actions.
Jon Stewart for President!
Stewart is trash
Is this possibly a lesser of two evils things? Like yeah his anti vaxx views are terrible and ignorant, but given the political climate and what’s actively happening in the US maybe his other views on humanity are better?
Honestly don’t know, not American and haven’t seen the episode being referenced yet
> “You’re a civil rights attorney who has been canceled by both the right and the left, which means you must be doing something right.”
This is such a lazy-ass take, both from a political perspective and from a comedy perspective.
Actually incredible to find an old interview with Stewart and RFK Jr (July 20, 2005) regarding the latter’s book on Mercury poisoning and vaccines.
A time when such conversations could be had. Now judging from OP’s article, the mere INDIRECT association to RFK Jr, even if its by a lawyer for crissakes, is enough to draw flak. This is not an improvement of discourse.