So many people who normally support judicial review of government action, and who normally support the right to protest, suddenly think judges are wrong and only entirely convenient protests should be allowed in this case.
Its such a sad example of the intellectual dishonesty of so many people, where you’ll justify almost anything because its your team.
Anyway, I never agreed with the trucker convoy stuff but I cant help but be appalled by how so many people here don’t care about freedoms if its against the „other guy.“
You’ll eventually reap what you see, just like down south
disloyal_royal on
There should be consequences for the politicians who violated the law
Alternative-Wait780 on
To be fair, Ford laid this problem at the doorstep of the Feds when it was a provincial issue. Another reason Ford ought to just resign in shame
TheBigC on
Why would the Beaverton have an article that is exactly opposite of what appeals court ruled? Do they have an agenda?
Radix2309 on
Just to point out, the EA was used for 2 purposes: to give the police federal resources, and to get around the legal loophole of crowdfunding sites not being covered by FINTRAC. That latter loophole was covered with legislation later that year.
People’s rights were not violated. They werent arbitrarily detained without due process or probable cause. Bank accounts can already be frozen without the EA, and is common practice when those accounts are used for criminal activity.
And no, nobody’s account was frozen just for donating. It was the people receiving the money and the organizers.
7 Kommentare
So many people who normally support judicial review of government action, and who normally support the right to protest, suddenly think judges are wrong and only entirely convenient protests should be allowed in this case.
Its such a sad example of the intellectual dishonesty of so many people, where you’ll justify almost anything because its your team.
Anyway, I never agreed with the trucker convoy stuff but I cant help but be appalled by how so many people here don’t care about freedoms if its against the „other guy.“
You’ll eventually reap what you see, just like down south
There should be consequences for the politicians who violated the law
To be fair, Ford laid this problem at the doorstep of the Feds when it was a provincial issue. Another reason Ford ought to just resign in shame
Why would the Beaverton have an article that is exactly opposite of what appeals court ruled? Do they have an agenda?
Just to point out, the EA was used for 2 purposes: to give the police federal resources, and to get around the legal loophole of crowdfunding sites not being covered by FINTRAC. That latter loophole was covered with legislation later that year.
People’s rights were not violated. They werent arbitrarily detained without due process or probable cause. Bank accounts can already be frozen without the EA, and is common practice when those accounts are used for criminal activity.
And no, nobody’s account was frozen just for donating. It was the people receiving the money and the organizers.
The Beaverton let this one slide?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/top-court-we-charity-scandal-hearings-ethics-challenge-9.7045081
Send those convoys to each and every house that thought it was a great idea.