Share.

    31 Kommentare

    1. Canadian’s call the US decision to launch a trade war with Canada ‚problematic‘

    2. They don’t want Canadian cars, so we don’t need any US BS.

      Complain about Canadian cars, FAFO

    3. ProtonPi314 on

      And I call the US’s decision to ignore the courts and the constitution problematic.

      I call the US’s decision to want to invade Canada , Greenland and other countries problematic and pretty much everything that’s going on down there.

    4. It’s problematic because, according to him, „we have tariffs to protect American auto workers“, which to me sounds like a classic case of FAFO

    5. You said you don’t need us. Literally yesterday. You said there is nothing you need from us. 

    6. USSMarauder on

      Being threatened with annexation was problematic

      Also Trump’s threat to tariff countries that don’t accept the US conquest of Greenland is also problematic

    7. ihatemyworkplace1 on

      Trump literally less than 24hr ago: „We don’t need a thing from Canada“.

    8. JimmyTheJimJimson on

      The US can take two steps back and mind it’s own f*cking business.

    9. MZillacraft3000 on

      But I thought America said they don’t need us anymore.

      So, why do they care of what we do to help our country?

    10. Wasn’t it just a day or two ago, the US ambassador doubled down on the “we don’t need anything from Canada”?

    11. Suspicious-Answer295 on

      This has strong „Yes I dumped you but I want to know why you’re going to dinner with Sara“ energy

    12. infinitynull on

      „We’re taking back all our automotive production to the US, but no you can’t replace it with manufacturing from another country.“

      Get bent. FAFO.

    13. The USA can go fuck themselves. This is competition for Tesla and other EV makers. Competition is good.

    14. everythingisemergent on

      I think the world finds Trump’s presidency „problematic“.

    15. Aggressive_Nothing62 on

      If Trump doesn’t like it, it just means you are doing the right thing.

    16. protective_ on

      Its because Chinese EVs will put the final nail in the coffin of the non-existent „North American EV Industry“ that our ham fisted politicians woefully try to defend. The EV war is over. China won years ago, its not even a competition anymore. Look at Chinas manufacturing capabilities, its absolute mind boggling 

    17. Mister_Chef711 on

      Regardless of what they say, the US obviously is heavily reliant on Canada. I’m not saying we aren’t more reliant on them, but they get a significant amount of their trade from us.

      There was obviously going to be a reaction and it’s something that would have been taken into consideration before signing the deal with China. People are going to act like we overplayed our hand with this but it’s a calculated decision to get away from an increasingly unpredictable US.

      My only worry is how big of a reaction we get and at what point they claim they need to take Canada before China does first just like Greenland.

    18. LongRoadNorth on

      You know what else is problematic? That the US flip flops every other day on whether they need us or not, and makes threats to invade allies.

      You know what’s even more problematic? That their sitting president is saying they don’t need elections, referring to the midterms, that are coming up.

      Oh and you know what’s also problematic? That the US is looking more and more like Nazi Germany every day with their gestapo/SS.

    19. MatthewsSnipes on

      Sorry but we’re Canada…. Why the fuck does the USA get to have a say in what we allow in our own country. Fuck off MAGA.

    Leave A Reply